Who Lives in a House Like This?

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 01 January 2012 21:34

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp226.net/zcj8Fh -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is amazing and disgusting: Who lives in a house like this? Imagine , who would have such taste and live in such opulence? American Billionaire ? Saudi Prince? - Louis XIVof France ? Premier footballer? Have a good look at these pictures, then scroll to the bottom to see who owns this work of Art. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This Mansion is in Harare and belongs to: The President of Zimbabwe - Robert Mugabe - While his people starve, they do not have food, and die because of no medical help..... And we help his people over and over again... He and his family live like this....... his GREED kills his people.... soon the whole world will know what this man is doing to his people. The citizens he supposedly serves? Scroll down ............. For years this Marxist, White hater was the darling of Canada's foreign aid establishment. We helped overthrow the financially stable, Christian White government of Ian Smith (1965-1979) and replace it with this Mugabe monster. The foreign policy officials who undermined, boycotted and helped destroy the stable, progressive and anti-communist White government (which granted a limited franchise to qualified Negroes) must be made to pay -- people like Kissinger and Joe Clark and Pierre Elliott Trudeau. At the very least their names should be reviled for the traitors to their own people they were. "For evil to flourish, all that is needed is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp226.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqgesu Powered by YourMailingListProvider

 

Who lives in a house like this?

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 01 January 2012 20:47

This is amazing and disgusting*:* *Who lives in a house like this?* * * Imagine , who would have such taste and live in such opulence? American Billionaire ? Saudi Prince? - Louis XIVof France ? Premier footballer? Have a good look at these pictures, then scroll to the bottom to see who owns this work of Art. * > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > * * ** This Mansion is in **Harare** and belongs to: ** ** ** The President of Zimbabwe - Robert Mugabe - ** ** While his people starve, they do not have food, and die because of no medical help..... ** **A**nd we help his people over and over again... ** **H**e and his family live like this....... his GREED kills his people.... ** soon the whole world will know** **what this man is doing to his people**. ** ** * The citizens he supposedly serves? Scroll down ............. For years this Marxist, White hater was the darling of Canada's foreign aid establishment. We helped overthrow the financially stable, Christian White government of Ian Smith (1965-1979) and replace it with this Mugabe monster. The foreign policy officials who undermined, boycotted and helped destroy the stable, progressive and anti-communist White government (which granted a limited franchise to qualified Negroes) must be made to pay -- people like Kissinger and Joe Clark and Pierre Elliott Trudeau. At the very least their names should be reviled for the traitors to their own people they were. *"For evil to flourish, all that is needed is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke * .

 

Marginalizing Ron Paul

Written by Paul Fromm

Sunday, 01 January 2012 10:16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp226.net/zhdpWM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Scheer Truthdig ( http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/marginalizing_ron_paul_20111229/ ) / Truthdig Op-Ed Published: Thursday 29 December 2011 “It is hypocritical that Paul is now depicted as the archenemy of non-white minorities when it was his nemesis, the Federal Reserve, that enabled the banking swindle that wiped out 53 percent of the median wealth of African-Americans and 66 percent for Latinos, according to the Pew Research Center.” MARGINALIZING RON PAUL Post a Com­ment ( http://www.nationofchange.org/marginalizing-ron-paul-1325223651#comments ) Re­size Text + | - | R Plain Text ( http://www.nationofchange.org/reader/4474 ) Print ( http://www.nationofchange.org/print/4474 ) SHARE ( http://www.nationofchange.org/print/4474 ) Email ( http://www.nationofchange.org/marginalizing-ron-paul-1325223651 ) ( http://www.nationofchange.org/marginalizing-ron-paul-1325223651 ) ( http://www.nationofchange.org/marginalizing-ron-paul-1325223651 ) It is of­fi­cial now. The Ron Paul cam­paign, de­spite surg­ing in the Iowa polls, is not wor­thy of se­ri­ous con­sid­er­a­tion, ac­cord­ing to a New York Times ed­i­to­r­ial; “Ron Paul long ago dis­qual­i­fied him­self for the pres­i­dency by ped­dling clap­trap pro­pos­als like abol­ish­ing the Fed­eral Re­serve, re­turn­ing to the gold stan­dard, cut­ting a third of the fed­eral bud­get and all for­eign aid and op­pos­ing the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” That last item, along with the decade-old racist com­ments in the newslet­ters Paul pub­lished, is cer­tainly wor­thy of crit­i­cism. But not as an al­ter­na­tive to se­ri­ously en­gag­ing the sub­stance of Paul’s cur­rent cam­paign—his dev­as­tat­ing cri­tique of crony cap­i­tal­ism and his equally tren­chant chal­lenge to im­pe­r­ial wars and the as­sault on our civil lib­er­ties that they en­gen­der. Paul is being den­i­grated as a pres­i­den­tial con­tender even though on the vital is­sues of the econ­omy, war and peace, and civil lib­er­ties, he has made the most sense of the Re­pub­li­can can­di­dates. And by what stan­dard of logic is it “clap­trap” for Paul to at­tempt to hold the Fed ac­count­able for its de­struc­tive poli­cies? That’s the give­away ref­er­ence to the raw nerve that his fa­vor­able prospects in the Iowa cau­cuses have ex­posed. Too much anti-Wall Street pop­ulism in the heart­land can be a truly scary thing to the in­tel­lec­tual par­a­sites re­sid­ing in the belly of the beast that con­trols Amer­i­can cap­i­tal­ism. It is hyp­o­crit­i­cal that Paul is now de­picted as the arch­en­emy of non-white mi­nori­ties when it was his neme­sis, the Fed­eral Re­serve, that en­abled the bank­ing swin­dle that wiped out 53 per­cent of the me­dian wealth of African-Amer­i­cans and 66 per­cent for Lati­nos, ac­cord­ing to the Pew Re­search Cen­ter. Most news sources are funded by cor­po­ra­tions and in­vestors. Their goal is to drive peo­ple to ad­ver­tis­ers while push­ing the cor­po­rate agenda. Na­tionofChange is a 501(c)3 or­ga­ni­za­tion funded al­most 100% from its read­ers–you! Our only ac­count­abil­ity is to the pub­lic. Click here to make a gen­er­ous do­na­tion. ( https://secure.nationofchange.org/?em=2 ) The Fed sits at the cen­ter of the rot and bears the major re­spon­si­bil­ity for tol­er­at­ing the run­away mort­gage-backed se­cu­ri­ties scam that is at the core of our eco­nomic cri­sis. After the melt­down it was the Fed that led ul­tra-se­cret machi­na­tions to bail out the banks while ig­nor­ing the plight of their ex­ploited cus­tomers. To his credit, Paul mar­shaled bi­par­ti­san sup­port to pass a bill re­quir­ing the first-ever pub­lic audit of the Fed­eral Re­serve. That audit is how read­ers of the Times first learned of the Fed’s tril­lions of dol­lars in se­cret loans and aid given to the banks as a re­ward for screw­ing over the pub­lic. As for the Times’ com­plaint that Paul seeks to un­rea­son­ably cut the fed­eral bud­get by one-third, it should be noted that his is a rare voice in chal­leng­ing ir­ra­tionally high mil­i­tary spend­ing. At a time when the pres­i­dent has signed off on a Cold War-level de­fense bud­get and his po­ten­tial op­po­nents in the Re­pub­li­can field want to waste even more on high-tech weapons to fight a so­phis­ti­cated enemy that doesn’t exist, Paul has emerged as the only se­ri­ous peace can­di­date. As The Wall Street Jour­nal re­ported, Paul last week warned an Iowa au­di­ence, “Watch out for the mil­i­tary-in­dus­trial com­plex—they al­ways have an enemy. No­body is going to in­vade us. We don’t need any more [weapons sys­tems].” As an­other re­cent ex­am­ple of Paul’s san­ity on the na­tional se­cu­rity is­sues that have led to a flight from rea­son on the part of politi­cians since the 9/11 at­tacks, I offer the Texan’s crit­i­cism this week of the Na­tional De­fense Au­tho­riza­tion Act (NDAA). The act would allow the pres­i­dent to order in­de­ter­mi­nate mil­i­tary im­pris­on­ment with­out trial of those ac­cused of sup­port­ing ter­ror­ism, a pol­icy that Obama signed into law and Paul op­poses, as the con­gress­man did George W. Bush’s Pa­triot Act. Paul said: “Lit­tle by lit­tle, in the name of fight­ing ter­ror­ism, our Bill of Rights is being re­pealed. ... The Pa­triot Act, as bad as its vi­o­la­tion of the 4th Amend­ment, was just one step down the slip­pery slope. The re­cently passed (NDAA) con­tin­ues that slip to­ward tyranny and in fact ac­cel­er­ates it sig­nif­i­cantly ... The Bill of Rights has no ex­emp­tion for ‘re­ally bad peo­ple’ or ter­ror­ists or even non-cit­i­zens. It is a key check on gov­ern­ment power against any per­son. This is not a weak­ness in our legal sys­tem; it is the very strength of our legal sys­tem.” That was ex­actly the ob­jec­tion raised by The New York Times in its own ex­cel­lent ed­i­to­r­ial chal­leng­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity of the NDAA. It should not be dif­fi­cult for those same ed­i­to­r­ial writ­ers to treat Ron Paul as a pro­found and prin­ci­pled con­trib­u­tor to a much-needed na­tional de­bate on the lim­its of fed­eral power in­stead of at­tempt­ing to mar­gin­al­ize his views be­yond recog­ni­tion. This ar­ti­cle was orig­i­nally posted on Truthdig ( http://www.truthdig.com/ ). _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp226.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqgess Powered by YourMailingListProvider