Written by Paul Fromm
Saturday, 06 March 2010 06:19
*Dear Free Speech Supporter:*
*I can only concur with what Arthur Topham says below. Canadians are being
indoctrinated into an ideology of shame and guilt. It seems hardly a month
goes by that our floor flushing government doesn't apologize to some
minority or other -- Indians for having provided them with education,
Chinese for having attempted to control a heartless influx engineered by
Chinese labour brokers by our imposing a head tax. Our education system
tells today's students little of the colossal achievements of European man.*
*It is any wonder there are self-hating White Canadians?*
*The Allies engineered the ethnic cleansing of 16-million Germans from
German lands. Of these 3-million were murdered -- a tragedy that never seems
to make it onto the "history" channel or into Steven Speilberg movies.
Germans were replaced from their lands. The heartless immigration policy
inaugurated in 1965 by the Canadian establishment -- Liberal, Conservatives,
NDP and accepted even by the phoney "nationalists" of the Bloc Quebecois --
will engineer the replacement of the European founding/settler people of
Canada by 2050.*
*And, as in Germany, if you question this national suicide of a people, the
iron hand of repression will fall upon you.*
*Paul Fromm*

*To all -*

*I happen to know Rigolf Hennig, M.D. a courageous German psychiatrist who
wrote this most insightful article and who has already spent time in a
German prison for his politically incorrect thoughts.*
*This is one of the most important articles that have ever come out of
Germany, a country in the very heart of Europe, still in a choke-hold by her
Allied occupiers for already three generations. *


*Comment by Arthur Topham ( Radical Press ):*

*A very informative article indeed and one that epitomizes other Western
nations also possessed by these Zionist forces who have infiltrated and
cultivated a false culture. Canada is in precisely the same situation with
respect to our national character make-up. Those who possess the wealth and
the media and the political influence have manipulated our minds and our
emotions and our historic context to the point where we begin to perceive
reality through Zionist-induced programmes that ultimately are debilitating
to our psyches and dangerous to our sovereign rights - be they freedom of
speech or freedom to bear arms or freedom to forego paying taxes to the
state or numerous other freedoms once accepted as inalienable.*

*What the writer sees in Germany's "Induced Insanity" should be a stark
warning to all other independent countries of what lies ahead for them too
if they don't start asserting their sovereignty in the face of global,
international organizations, all of them Zionist/Rothschild creations
designed to destroy nations and create their global slave state.*

*Germany has paid the price for too long for having challenged the
Rothschild Evil Empire and lost. If we don't resist this subtle and
slow-motion indoctrination of our nation, we too will end up thinking and
reacting like the German nation of today does.*

*Keeping the truth alive therefore becomes an imperative motive and a
genuine necessity if we wish to remain free.*
Das eingepflanzte Irresein
Germany’s Induced Insanity
By Dr. Rigolf Hennig, MD
Translated by J M Damon
The original is posted on several websites including <>

*If a German had said in 1945 that within 60 years large numbers of his
countrymen would be celebrating the Wehrmacht’s unconditional surrender as
"liberation,” his mental condition would have been highly suspect.
*He would have been considered psychotic, schizophrenic, insane.
Today, however, our national mental health has deteriorated to the point
that such insanity is endemic.
*Today it is unusual to find a German with intact rational facilities. *
*What has happened to us during the past six decades?
*To find the answer to this question, we have to begin at the beginning.
In what sense were we “liberated” following World War II?
*Were we “liberated” by the 14 to 15 million dead in a war that was forced
on us?
*Were we “liberated” by the three million women, children and elderly who
died while attempting to flee rampaging Russians, Poles and Czechs?
*„Liberated” by the expulsion of many millions of German minorities in
Southeast and East Europe?
*“Liberated” by the additional millions of noncombatants killed by British
and American terrorist bombings of the densely populated residential areas
of our cities?
*“Liberated” by the deliberate American and French mass murder of a million
German prisoners of war through starvation and exposure, after our armed
forces had capitulated?
*“Liberated” by the loss of a third of our ancestral territory, our Eastern
*“Liberated” by forced labour in the SU, in USA, France and in GB?
*“Liberated” by the starvation programme after the war of all Germans
induced by the Morgenthau plan?
*“Liberated” by the burden of millions of cripples and orphans in the
aftermath of the War?
*Were we “liberated” by the theft of our private and public property, art
treasures, historical monuments, cultural institutions, international
patents, etc., etc.?
*Were we “liberated” from our sanity?*
*Following unconditional capitulation, Germany was immediately partitioned
into four isolated occupation zones, which further intensified our
incapacitation and prepared the way for so-called “re-education.”
*This was in fact designed to complete the permanent crippling of our Reich,
which was, after all, the point of both World Wars.
*The desperate material scarcity that our enemies artificially created in
Germany following the First World War did not prove adequate for our
complete subjugation, and so our enemies were taking no chances that we
might recover a second time.*
*To be precise, mental crippling is what has been inflicted on the Germans
in the last six decades.
*The unscrupulous Allies, assisted by collaborators from our own ranks, have
robbed us of our history, laws, culture and, above all, of the capacity to
investigate and understand what happened to us.
*They have succeeded in inducing guilt complexes that produced the classic
symptoms of national psychosis that we see today.*
*Re-education and Psychological Tricks *
*The basic techniques of what is now called “brainwashing” have been
familiar to us since ancient times, while Emil Kraepelin (1856 - 1926), the
“Nestor of modern psychiatry,” introduced the concept of “Induced Insanity”
over 100 years ago.
What is new is the extent to which an entire nation with a highly evolved
culture can be driven into an abnormal mental state, to the point of
collective incapacitation.
*We are still dealing with the ancient method, familiar to all psychologists
and psychiatrists, of inducing abnormal behavior or perception through
mental and intellectual manipulation. *
*The fields of psychology and psychiatry have long been familiar with three
forms of insanity: innate, acquired and induced.
*The layman needs no further explanation of innate (hereditary) insanity, or
of insanity that is acquired by such things as disease, injury or poisoning.
*Since prehistoric times we have been familiar with insanity induced by
overwhelming psychological influence such as ceremonial rituals, especially
during the vulnerable juvenile stages of intellectual development.
*Today, those of us who specialize in studying this form of mental
incapacitation understand it much better.
*Induced insanity has little to do with intelligence but a great deal to do
with suspension of logical thought brought about by targeted indoctrination.

*The younger and less mature the psyche, the more devastating are the
effects of indoctrination.
*Through early targeting and indoctrination all logical thinking, including
the vital inherent reflexes of self-preservation and preservation of
species, can be neutralaized.
*When this happens, the subject can be conditioned to act against his own
vital interests.*
*During youth, physical and psychical conditioning take hold for one’s
entire life, leaving the subject irreversibly “programmed.”
*To illustrate with a simple example: Japanese, Chinese and other East
Asians are unable to learn to pronounce the letter "R” after the 4th year of
*This is because development of the part of the brain involved with speech
acquisition ends at that age.
*After age 4, changes in this mental function are no longer possible.
In Europe, Asian children learn to pronounce “R” as easily as European
children do and conversely, European children who grow up speaking Asiatic
languages cannot learn to pronounce “R” after the age of 4. *
*Similarly, the creative ability to deal with complex thought processes
essentially ends at age 10.
*This too was well understood in antiquity.
*For example, the Romans usually killed all males above the age of 10 in
their wars of conquest, for the simple reason that older children were
bearers of their culture.
A subjugated people could be successfully Romanized only if their culture
was completely destroyed.
*During the middle ages, Christian rulers successfully applied the same
principle, with a bit more refinement.
*They would abduct the sons of their pagan opponents during early childhood,
as for example the children of Borod the leader of the Carinthians in the
9th Century.
*The Christian raised these royal children in what we would call
“re-education camps,” in this case the monastery at Frauenchiemsee, and then
used them against their own people and their own culture.*
*Perhaps the best-known example of induced insanity is that of the Turkish
Janissaries of the 14th - 19th centuries, who were used to spearhead Turkish
conquests during the Counter Crusades.
*The "Waffen SS of the Sublime Porte," as well as bodyguards of the Sultan,
they were the abducted children of Christians.
*Provided that they were young enough when abducted for a thorough
re-education, they could be used for any purpose, including murder of their
own parents and siblings.
*In our time, the fanatical child-soldiers of Cambodia followed the same
They fought against their own parents on behalf of Pol Pot and the Khmer
Rouge, often torturing their own parents to death.
*The brutal Communist methods of brainwashing as used on adults employed a
coarse technique that most often left weak individuals mentally crippled.
*If the targeted individuals possessed strong characters, however, they had
the capacity to survive and recover.*
*It was reserved for the modern techniques of Western re-education with
their sophisticated and gradual brainwashing to turn an entire major nation
against its own vital interests, however.
*It has accomplished this through the combined use of all communication,
entertainment and education media.
*As in ancient and medieval re-education, modern re-education begins in
early childhood and is backed by the combined resources of the legislative,
executive and the judicial branches government.*
*The most tragic example of this is present-day Germany in all its
anti-national manifestations.
*After Germany lost the Second World War, along with its intellectual elite
and leading culture carriers, its enemies introduced a sharply focused and
skillfully applied programme of re-education.
*This program radically rejected everything that constituted the national
German character and transformed into its opposite.
*In this way it destroyed the characteristic German behavior patterns that
maintain national identity as well as cultural and intellectual heritage.
*These inherited behavior patterns and strategies had emerged over
generations of selection as a survival strategy in the struggle for
*Robbed of these patterns and strategies, Germany is doomed to destruction.
The German nation has already fallen a great distance backwards, assaulted
by its envious competitors far beyond the limits of law and morality, on
account of its spirituality and vitality.
*Germany’s fall is evidenced by its continual self-castigation, which is
saturated with “Crime and Punishment” style national masochism following
over 60 years of relentless re-education.*
*Why did the treacherous representatives of the “Bundesrepublik” welcome
their own defeat on the occasion of enemy victory celebrations in Normandy?
This was, after all, an assault on Europe by non-European powers!
What reasons could Chancellor Schroeder possibly have for apologizing to the
Poles in Warsaw?
*Was it perhaps because the Wehrmacht granted insurgent partisan combatants
the status of legal combatants and granted female partisans free passage,
which it was not obliged to do under the Hague Convention on Land Warfare?
*Consider that partisans or “insurgents” have no status as combatants!
They are assassins against their own people as well as the opposing fighting
force - thieves, spies, cowards, terrorists and traitors - thus they must be
neutralized by whatever means are necessary.
*Schröder might have been called “Chancellor,” but he was obviously not a
rational leader of a sovereign nation.*
*What drives the media of our so-called "republic" to equate the destruction
of Dresden with the raid on Coventry? How can they blame the deliberate mass
murder of hundreds of thousands of women and children on their own
Coventry, Britain's major industrial center, was so heavily defended that it
was impossible to accurately target; and this imprecise German bombing
resulted in the loss of around 400 civilian lives!
*Dresden by contrast was an open nonindustrial city and cultural center
that, as Allied leaders well knew, was desperately overcrowded with refugee
women and children fleeing the Red Army. It was planned mass murder carried
out by British and American bombers that killed a thousand times as many
civilians as did the raid on the industrial center of Coventry! *
*These treacherous “re-educated” collaborators are misusing the
commemorations of our disastrous defeat to confuse cause and effect. Their
object is to imprison all Germans in a paranoid ghetto of "Crime and
Punishment," incessantly repeating the fiction of Germany’s sole
responsibility for the War.
*Our enemies and “re-educated” collaborators constantly ignore the fact that
not we but England and France declared war in 1939 as well as the fact that
the United States had already initiated hostilities without declaring war.
*Germany attacked Poland only after Poland, incited by British-French
guarantees, had murdered thousands of Germans in the provinces stolen from
us at Versailles, while driving additional tens of thousands from their
homes and interning them in concentration camps.
*The United States attacked Yugoslavia in 1991 for much weaker reasons!*
*Of all our enemies, the ones who have done the most harm are not our allied
"liberators" but rather their German helpers, mentally crippled and
“re-educated” flunkies who are determined to be “more Catholic than the
*The victors of World War II benefited greatly from a tragic German
character trait that our "liberators” clearly factored into their postwar
*Bismarck described this proclivity very well: "The compulsion to serve
foreign interests, even when this is possible only through abandonment of
our own national interests, is a disease whose geographic distribution is
limited to Germany."*
*{ Napoleon had made a similar observation forty years before, when
he wrote:
*“There is no nation that is more congenial than the Germans, but no nation
that is more credulous.
*It was never necessary for me to sow discord among them, all I had to do
was spread my nets and they would run into them like skittish animals,
grabbing each other by the throat in the belief they were doing their
‘duty.’ No nation on Earth is more foolish.
No lie is so crude that the Germans will not believe it!
*On account of some fanciful slogan they would attack their fellow
countrymen with greater fury than they attacked their real enemies.”]*
*One could go on and on with examples of Germans’ soiling their own nest.
The list is as long as one wants to make it, as new self-destructive
absurdities occur every day.
In the words of former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, "We have falsified our own
history into a criminal record!"
Why do we do this?
On whose behalf do we falsify our own history?
Some of these intellectual cripples who call themselves Germans have
actually begun advocating collective suicide by screaming "Deutschland
verrecke!” (Death to Germany!)*
*Furthermore this induced insanity is no longer restricted to limited
We are on the verge of collective insanity as this sociological malaise
spreads to the entire nation.
Amazing numbers of our contemporaries are now behaving like Pavlovian dogs.
Pavlov, the famous St. Petersburg behaviorist, conditioned his laboratory
animals so that they would begin salivating and releasing gastric juices at
the sound of a bell.
He did this by feeding them only when the bell rang, and so succeeded in
“re-educating” them by resetting their nervous and digestive systems to a
false stimulus.
The same thing has happened to our re-educated Germans.
They have been conditioned to the extent that when they hear words such as
“Heimat” (Homeland), “Vaterland,” “Nation,” and "Volk," their nervous
systems release adrenalin with the result that they react aggressively, even
hysterically. *
* *
*To recognize and confront a superior enemy operating from behind cover is
without doubt one of the most difficult tasks imaginable - and yet this is
precisely what we Germans must do to survive.
*The good news: to recognize and see through our enemy's methods is to win
half the victory.
Complete victory will be achieved when Germany regains its sovereign
capacity to act in its legitimate state, which is the German Reich.*
Written by Paul Fromm
Wednesday, 03 March 2010 06:34
*Open Letter to Just Released Political Prisoner, Ernst Zundel*

Liebe Ernst:

First, hearty congratulations on being released yesterday as a political
prisoner incarcerated by what you so rightly call the German “vassal state.”
The soulless descendants of men whose boots they are not fit to even lick
extracted the full term of their 5-year sentence imposed upon you for being
a heretic.

It is almost five years to the day since I was called to the Metro West
Detention Centre where you had been kept in solitary confinement for 25
months – confinement usually reserved for the most dangerous of criminals.
This treatment was what one might expect from the sorry hypocritical
Canadian state that loves to wag its finger and preach human rights but is
as comfortable as its Red Chinese pals in jailing dissenters or gagging the
Internet. In some ways, though, Ernst, your ideas, your dissent from the new
religion of holocaust, was more dangerous to our political establishment and
the minority puppeteers than the activities of a gunman, rapist, or armed

JB and I went around to the prison to collect boxes of your correspondence
reflecting the hundreds of devoted people around the globe who had written
to you to support and encourage you in prison.

We learned that you had been sneaked on a private jet – which government
paid for that ? – surreptitiously (“security” reasons, you know) – to be
sent back to Germany to face charges for Internet postings legally made in
North America. The extraterritorial claim of jurisdiction, of course, didn’t
trouble Canada’s highly politicized courts and they had blithely consigned
you to s kangaroo trial and certain jail in Germany.

So, Ernst, we go back a long time. The Canadian Association for Free
Expression did its modest part to help publicize your various cases going
back to 1985 and the ludicrous “false news” charges for which you were3w
twice prosecuted. Later we joined as an intervenor in the Canadian Human
Rights Commissions’ Sec. 13 “Internet” hate charges, a case that went on
from 1996 to 2002.

In today’s TORONTO SUN (March 2, 2010), Mark Bonokoski, unable to act as
anything from a hate-spewing voice for his ethnic group’s lobby called you a
“rat.” The headline reported on the Canadian Jewish Congress website
charged: “Rat let out of his cage.” Years ago, we called you the “Galileo of
Revisionism.” A rat is vicious and secretive. You have always been friendly
and up front in the 70s and 80s in your defence of the rights of German
parents not to have their ethnic group defamed and vilified in schools, and
later in your skepticism about the new state religion of holocaust.

Ultimately, you were punished, not because the facts and research you
adduced to question the claims and assertions of the new religion were
false, but because you had questioned at all. Many, probably you included,
felt that the extravagant claims of German wrongdoing – the vehemence of
which increased with each year as WW II receded into history – were matters
of historical or scientific facts misreported or wrong. You sought to shed
the light of research and statistics on these claims That was not allowed.
One id not allowed to question or discuss what is called “the holocaust”
because it is not a historical event. It is a religion, a religion that has
all but become the state religion in most of what was once called “the Free
World.” You were not punished because you got the facts wrong – you didn’t.
You were punished because you were a heretic, because you refused to say
that Ooga Booga, he with three purple horns, lived up on top of the
mountain, was god and should be adored.

Thus, like Galileo, you refused to assent to foolish superstition or state
imposed belief and sought to see what facts, eyewitnesses and forensics had
to tell us of the events of WW II.

We honour you and rejoice in your release from prison and pray and strive
for the day when you enjoy real freedom and we in Canada and even more your
countrymen in super repressive Germany enjoy freedom of thought and freedom
of expression which are our rights. – *Paul Fromm, Director, CANADIAN
Written by Paul Fromm
Monday, 01 March 2010 07:23
*Free speech victory in Whatcott v. Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal*

*[Slowly the Canadian Courts are beginning to roll back some of the more
outrageous anti-free speech and anti-Christian rulings of Canada's
out-of-control human rights commissions. -- Paul Fromm]*

CALGARY: The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) today responded to the
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision in Whatcott v. Saskatchewan Human
Rights Tribunal, a case in which the CCF had intervened in support of free

In a decision released February 25, the 3-member court ruled that William
Whatcott did not violate section 14(1)(b) of the Saskatchewan Human Rights
Code by distributing flyers to oppose the teaching of homosexuality in
Saskatoon’s public schools.

The flyers distributed by Mr. Whatcott in Saskatoon and Regina in 2001 and
2002 were polemical and inflammatory, and the court noted in its decision
that many people would find his words “crude, offensive, and pejorative.”
The contents of the flyers are re-printed in the court’s decision. ...

The Court set aside a Human Rights Tribunal Order that Mr. Whatcott pay
$17,500 to four gay complainants who were offended by his flyers. The
Saskatchewan Human Rights Code prohibits the publication of any statement
which “exposes or tends to expose to hatred, ridicules, belittles or
otherwise affronts the dignity of any person or class of persons” on the
basis of age, race, religion, sexual orientation, and other grounds.

“This court decision is good news for free speech,” stated lawyer John
Carpay, Executive Director of the CCF, which intervened in support of the
right of citizens to express their religious and political opinions on
matters of public policy.

“Unfortunately, the court did not strike down the restrictions on free
speech. But nothing prevents our federal and provincial politicians from
repealing these laws,” continued Carpay.
<< Start < Prev 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 Next > End >>
Page 96 of 142
Powered by MMS Blog