Hear Paul Fromm -- The Fighting Side of Me: Press Smears & Anatomy of a Killing

Written by Paul Fromm

Tuesday, 09 August 2011 03:34

Hear Paul Fromm -- The Fighting Side of Me: Press Smears & Anatomy of a Killing<http://reasonradionetwork.com/20110802/the-fighting-side-of-me-press-smears-anatomy-of-a-killing> August 2, 2011 [image: Doug Christie "The Battling Barrister"]<http://reasonradionetwork.com/images/2011/08/Doug_Christie.jpg> Doug Christie, “The Battling Barrister” Host Paul Fromm: - Blasts the *Calgary Sun* for smearing local youth asking questions about mass immigration as “racists” and “White supremacists”; - Hammers *Globe and Mail* for soap opera reporting of first day of Jeff Hughes inquest; - Gives full report on inquest into White Nationalist Jeff Hughes killing by RCMP in Nanaimo— - 23 shots fired at Hughes allegedly armed with a flare gun he never fired; - Hughes shot in the back; - Police too scared to approach downed man — Hughes bled out for 20 minutes; - Hughes' family lawyer Doug Christie repeatedly shut down by Coroner Marj Paonessa. - http://reasonradionetwork.com/20110802/the-fighting-side-of-me-press-smears-anatomy-of-a-killing

 

Participate in Immigration Policy Consultation

Written by Paul Fromm

Monday, 08 August 2011 04:07

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp77.com/z5AAub -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Participate in Immigration Policy Consultation Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has announced an immigration policy consultation this summer. It's vital that you, as someone concerned about the massive invasion of our country, the demographics-changing tidal wave and the heartless policy -- Liberal, Conservative or NDP -- of continuing to flood this country with newcomers at a time of high unemployment, SPEAK UP. Go to the Citizenship and Immigration website -- link below -- and register. And, then, what? We're not sure. You MAY be contacted for further input. While we're skeptical of this whole process, it's still vital for all IMMIGRATION REFORMERS TO TRY TO PARTICIPATE. www.cic.gc.ca language: EnglishFrançais IMMIGRATION LEVELS AND MIX: STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION Thank you for your interest in Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s online consultation on Immigration Levels and Mix. An online consultation will be held in late summer 2011. If you are interested in participating in this activity, please provide your contact information below. You will be contacted when the consultation is launched. CONTACT INFORMATION * Name * Organization (if applicable) * E-mail address http://cic.sondages-surveys.ca/s/immigration/?l=eng ( http://cic.sondages-surveys.ca/s/immigration/?l=eng ) A July 12 press release from Immigration Minister Jason Kenney announcing this consultation explains: "The purpose of the consultations is to seek feedback on immigration levels, including the appropriate level of immigration for Canada, and the most suitable mix between economic, family class and protected persons." Worrisome is the phrasing that this consultation seeks input from stakeholders. Now, all Canadian citizens are "stakeholders" in the immigration debate, seeing that the flood of the last 35 years has radically changed the face and makeup of this Dominion and, given the current levels, 85 per cent from the Third World and the present Candian birthrate, is calculated to render the European founding/settelr people a minority in their own land by 2050. However, "stakeholders" has a sneaky inhouse meaning. It means the self-interested immigration industry -- greedy immigration lawyers and consultants, ESL teachers, of course, self-interested immigrant and ethnic groups, as well as the legions of social workers and immigrant settlement folks who have jobs, thanks to poorly screened immigration. We are told: "Invited stakeholders represent a variety of perspectives, including those of employers, labour, academia, learning institutions, professional organizations, business organizations, regulatory bodies, municipalities, settlement provider organizations and ethnocultural organizations." On the CIC site is an interesting "Background Paper" with helpful statistics about current immigration levels and makeup. The paper poses the key question of the consultation: "The purpose of this consultation is to seek your feedback on Canada’s immigration programme. We are asking for your input on the right level of immigration to Canada – how many – and the right mix between the three immigrant classes to Canada – economic, family and protected persons. Should immigration levels be higher?" Note, from the last question, that the presumed answer is the same level or higher levels. Nevertheless, it's vital that we participate. On a very basic level, with current unemployment at 7.2 per cent (really over 10 per cent, as the official level counts only those collecting Employment Insurance, the answer is simple: Until we achieve close to full employment we need NO immigration at all. Recent public opinion soundings also suggest that many Canadians are not enamoured of the flood that so delights the government, the "stakeholders" and the politically correct: "More than half of Canadians think immigrants are a burden on the country's strapped social services and two-thirds believe the federal government should give priority to educated or highly skilled foreigners when considering who to let into the country. Results of a worldwide poll by Ipsos released this week show 56 per cent of Canadians think immigration has put too much pressure on public services in Canada compared to 17 per cent who disagreed with the statement (22 per cent were neutral and four per cent said they did not know)." (Vancouver Sun, August 5, 2011) Paul Fromm Director CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp77.com/u.php?id=gmjhqsqgsgbbqgqe Powered by YourMailingListProvider

 

Participate in Immigration Policy Consultation

Written by Paul Fromm

Monday, 08 August 2011 04:02

*Participate in Immigration Policy Consultation* Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has announced an immigration policy consultation this summer. It's vital that you, as someone concerned about the massive invasion of our country, the demographics-changing tidal wave and the heartless policy -- Liberal, Conservative or NDP -- of continuing to flood this country with newcomers at a time of high unemployment, SPEAK UP. Go to the Citizenship and Immigration website -- link below -- and register. And, then, what? We're not sure. You MAY be contacted for further input. While we're skeptical of this whole process, it's still vital for all IMMIGRATION REFORMERS TO TRY TO PARTICIPATE. [image: Citizenship and Immigration Canada] [image: Symbol of the Government of Canada] Citizenship and Immigration Canada www.cic.gc.ca language: English Français Immigration Levels and Mix: Stakeholder and Public Consultation Thank you for your interest in Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s online consultation on Immigration Levels and Mix. An online consultation will be held in late summer 2011. If you are interested in participating in this activity, please provide your contact information below. You will be contacted when the consultation is launched. *CONTACT INFORMATION* - Name - Organization (if applicable) - E-mail address http://cic.sondages-surveys.ca/s/immigration/?l=eng A July 12 press release from Immigration Minister Jason Kenney announcing this consultation explains: "The purpose of the consultations is to seek feedback on immigration levels, including the appropriate level of immigration for Canada, and the most suitable mix between economic, family class and protected persons." Worrisome is the phrasing that this consultation seeks input from stakeholders. Now, *all Canadian citizens are "stakeholders*" in the immigration debate, seeing that the flood of the last 35 years has radically changed the face and makeup of this Dominion and, given the current levels, 85 per cent from the Third World and the present Candian birthrate, is calculated to render the European founding/settelr people a minority in their own land by 2050. However, "stakeholders" has a sneaky inhouse meaning. It means the self-interested immigration industry -- greedy immigration lawyers and consultants, ESL teachers, of course, self-interested immigrant and ethnic groups, as well as the legions of social workers and immigrant settlement folks who have jobs, thanks to poorly screened immigration. We are told: "Invited stakeholders represent a variety of perspectives, including those of employers, labour, academia, learning institutions, professional organizations, business organizations, regulatory bodies, municipalities, settlement provider organizations and ethnocultural organizations." On the CIC site is an interesting "Background Paper" with helpful statistics about current immigration levels and makeup. The paper poses the key question of the consultation: "The purpose of this consultation is to seek your feedback on Canada’s immigration programme. We are asking for your input on the right level of immigration to Canada – how many – and the right mix between the three immigrant classes to Canada – economic, family and protected persons. Should immigration levels be higher?" Note, from the last question, that the presumed answer is the same level or higher levels. Nevertheless, it's vital that we participate. On a very basic level, with current unemployment at 7.2 per cent (really over 10 per cent, as the official level counts only those collecting Employment Insurance, the answer is simple: *Until we achieve close to full employment we need NO immigration at all.* Recent public opinion soundings also suggest that many Canadians are not enamoured of the flood that so delights the government, the "stakeholders" and the politically correct: "More than half of Canadians think immigrants are a burden on the country's strapped social services and two-thirds believe the federal government should give priority to educated or highly skilled foreigners when considering who to let into the country. Results of a worldwide poll by Ipsos released this week show 56 per cent of Canadians think immigration has put too much pressure on public services in Canada compared to 17 per cent who disagreed with the statement (22 per cent were neutral and four per cent said they did not know)." (*Vancouver Sun*, August 5, 2011) *Paul Fromm * *Director* *CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE*