Why I’m leaving Canada

Written by Paul Fromm

Tuesday, 20 September 2011 06:36

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp128.com/zBhHxy -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why I’m leaving Canada by John Newton I’m a sixty four year old Canadian born man who watched this country grow into an amazing place to live, and I never thought I’d ever be forced to someday leave it. Over the past few decades I’ve been an eye witness to Canada’s destruction, mostly due to our government flooding the country with massive numbers of immigrants, and catering to their every demand. I’m not questioning the quality of immigrants Canada has been accepting, but it is obvious our government has been taking in way too many each year. You can’t pump nearly 700,000 people per year into a country with a population of only thirty million, and expect not to experience problems. Canada’s health care systems are prime examples, as we went from having doctors who do house calls to not even being able to find a family doctor. You have to question the intelligence of a government who continually floods our country with massive numbers of people when we have an unemployment rate of more than 8%. It’s great to be compassionate towards immigrants, but enough is enough. My wife and I are moving to Costa Rica to escape the destruction of Canada. It’s just too heart breaking for us to stay here and watch such a good country continue to deteriorate and eventually die, due to government negligence. Twenty thousand Canadians have already fled to Costa Rica, mostly due to the much better health care system, a fully democratic government, very low property taxes, less violent crime, fresh air, moderate climate all year long, and a pure sense of freedom. If you would like more information about escaping to Costa Rica, I am more than willing to provide you with information. [email protected] Frankly, I believe in staying and fighting to take back the Dominion of Canada from the usurpers and interlopers and New World Order revolutionaries, but Mr. Newton makes some powerful points. -- Paul Fromm _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp128.com/u.php?id=gmjhqsqgsgbbqgusw Powered by YourMailingListProvider

 

Threatened With Life in Prison, Political Prisoner Terry Tremaine Heads to Court

Written by Paul Fromm

Tuesday, 20 September 2011 06:32

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp128.com/zdmoFP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Threatened With Life in Prison, Political Prisoner Terry Tremaine Heads to Court VANCOUVER. September 19, 2011. Political prisoner and free speech dissident Terry Tremaine heads to the Federal Court of Appeal today in Vancouver. The Canadian Human Rights Commission is appealing a bitter loss in Federal Court last November. Federal Judge Sean Harrington found Mr. Tremaine not guilty of “contempt of court.” The judge ruled that the Canadian Human Rights Commission had registered a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal “cease and desist”gag order in February, 2007 but had failed to serve Mr. Tremaine until August of 2009. This is the latest round in a bitter campaign by the Canadian state to silence the jovial former university math instructor. The chief instigator in this six year campaign of persecution, which has already seen a Mr. Tremaine serve 23 days in prison, is Ottawa lawyer Richard Warman who works for the Department of National Defence. Mr. Warman filed a Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) complaint against Mr. Tremaine in 2005. In April of that year, he wrote a letter denouncing Mr. Tremaine and demanding “appropriate”action to Mr. Tremaine’s employer, the University of Saskatchewan. He promptly lost his job. Warman wrote the complain even though Mr. Tremaine’s case had not yet been heard, and, indeed, would not be for another year. Still before the complaint was adjudicated, under a law which has since been declared unconstitutional, Mr, Warman filed a complaint with the Regina City Police alleging Mr. Tremaine had violated Canada’s notorious “hate law”, Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, for many of the same postings that formed the grounds for the human rights complaint. In February, 2007, a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found Mr. Tremaine guilty of a discriminatory practice, and, although penniless, fined him $4,000 and hit him with a “cease and desist” order, enjoining him from repeating the impugned statements or making similar statements. Mr, Tremaine for the next 10 months continued to post on his nspc website, although he tried to moderate his expressions. In 2009, Mr. Warman complained again and the Canadian Human Rights Commission launched a “contempt of court” action, which was ignominiously adjourned sine die when prosecutor Daniel Poulin discovered that Mr. Tremaine had never been served. In conversations in July, 2009, Mr. Poulin made it clear to Paul Fromm, who had been Mr. Tremaine’s representative at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal that Mr. Tremaine could avoid jail, if he’d just take down his website. “Now, the scope of the ‘cease and desist’ order had expanded from avoiding the repetition of a few statements that might be offensive to privileged minorities to the shutting down of his website and the removal of over a thousand posts Mr. Tremaine had made on STORMFRONT,” says Mr. Fromm. “This was the same pattern we saw in the Lemire case, where, when we tried to probe exactly what statements were offensive, we were told that it wasn’t just the statements in theoriginal Warman complaint but the ‘totality’ of the site. We were told that even the name ‘Freedomsite’ and its mailing address were‘hate.’. It became clear that the state censors were going far beyond the‘remedial’ goals of the law, bad as it is, and were trying to totally silence Internet dissidents.” Early in 2010, the relentless serial complainer Richard Warman filed more allegations against Mr. Tremaine and the compliant CHRC again charged Mr. Tremaine with “contempt of court.” He was acquitted and the acquittal is the subject of the appeal. In the meantime, Mr. Poulin has made it clear that he will seek what Mr. Tremaine calls “life in prison on the installment plan” – a year if the appeal goes against Mr. Tremaine; a longer sentence, if he doesn’t take down his website; a longer sentence, when that one is served, if the website remains up. Mr. Tremaine’s lawyer Douglas Christie of Victoria, raised many other issues at the appeal. The judge hung his ruling on the want of proper notice. However, Mr. Christie also challenged the assertions that Mr. Tremaine’s Internet postings on a website in another country constitute “communicating.” He cited several Supreme Court rulings in copyright cases which held that “communication”occurred, not when copyrighted music was uploaded to a website, but when it was downloaded, without paying royalty fees. Thus, ironically, Mr. Christie says,“the person guilty of communication might be Canadian ‘hate cops’ or people like Mr. Warman who download the material.|”” A further complication is that Mr. Tremaine cannot now legally add to, delete or tamper with his postings on STORMFRONT or with his website, under bail conditions relating to the Sec. 319 charges instigated by Mr. Warman. This case will be heard in Regina, June 4, 2012. _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp128.com/u.php?id=gmjhqsqgsgbbqgush Powered by YourMailingListProvider

 

Threatened With Life in Prison, Political Prisoner Terry Tremaine Heads to Court

Written by Paul Fromm

Tuesday, 20 September 2011 06:28

*Threatened With Life in Prison, Political Prisoner Terry Tremaine Heads to Court* *VANCOUVER**. September 19, 2011*. Political prisoner and free speech dissident Terry Tremaine heads to the Federal Court of Appeal today in Vancouver. The Canadian Human Rights Commission is appealing a bitter loss in Federal Court last November. Federal Judge Sean Harrington found Mr. Tremaine not guilty of “contempt of court.” The judge ruled that the Canadian Human Rights Commission had registered a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal “cease and desist”gag order in February, 2007 but had failed to serve Mr. Tremaine until August of 2009. This is the latest round in a bitter campaign by the Canadian state to silence the jovial former university math instructor. The chief instigator in this six year campaign of persecution, which has already seen a Mr. Tremaine serve 23 days in prison, is Ottawa lawyer Richard Warman who works for the Department of National Defence. Mr. Warman filed a Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) complaint against Mr. Tremaine in 2005. In April of that year, he wrote a letter denouncing Mr. Tremaine and demanding “appropriate”action to Mr. Tremaine’s employer, the University of Saskatchewan. He promptly lost his job. Warman wrote the complain even though Mr. Tremaine’s case had not yet been heard, and, indeed, would not be for another year. Still before the complaint was adjudicated, under a law which has since been declared unconstitutional, Mr, Warman filed a complaint with the Regina City Police alleging Mr. Tremaine had violated Canada’s notorious “hate law”, Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, for many of the same postings that formed the grounds for the human rights complaint. In February, 2007, a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found Mr. Tremaine guilty of a discriminatory practice, and, although penniless, fined him $4,000 and hit him with a “cease and desist” order, enjoining him from repeating the impugned statements or making similar statements. Mr, Tremaine for the next 10 months continued to post on his nspc website, although he tried to moderate his expressions. In 2009, Mr. Warman complained again and the Canadian Human Rights Commission launched a “contempt of court” action, which was ignominiously adjourned *sine die* when prosecutor Daniel Poulin discovered that Mr. Tremaine had never been served. In conversations in July, 2009, Mr. Poulin made it clear to Paul Fromm, who had been Mr. Tremaine’s representative at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal that Mr. Tremaine could avoid jail, if he’d just take down his website. “Now, the scope of the ‘cease and desist’ order had expanded from avoiding the repetition of a few statements that might be offensive to privileged minorities to the shutting down of his website and the removal of over a thousand posts Mr. Tremaine had made on STORMFRONT,” says Mr. Fromm. “This was the same pattern we saw in the *Lemire *case, where, when we tried to probe exactly what statements were offensive, we were told that it wasn’t just the statements in theoriginal Warman complaint but the ‘totality’ of the site. We were told that even the name ‘Freedomsite’ and its mailing address were‘hate.’. It became clear that the state censors were going far beyond the‘remedial’ goals of the law, bad as it is, and were trying to totally silence Internet dissidents.” Early in 2010, the relentless serial complainer Richard Warman filed more allegations against Mr. Tremaine and the compliant CHRC again charged Mr. Tremaine with “contempt of court.” He was acquitted and the acquittal is the subject of the appeal. In the meantime, Mr. Poulin has made it clear that he will seek what Mr. Tremaine calls “life in prison on the installment plan” – a year if the appeal goes against Mr. Tremaine; a longer sentence, if he doesn’t take down his website; a longer sentence, when that one is served, if the website remains up. Mr. Tremaine’s lawyer Douglas Christie of Victoria, raised many other issues at the appeal. The judge hung his ruling on the want of proper notice. However, Mr. Christie also challenged the assertions that Mr. Tremaine’s Internet postings on a website in another country constitute “communicating.” He cited several Supreme Court rulings in copyright cases which held that “communication”occurred, not when copyrighted music was uploaded to a website, but when it was downloaded, without paying royalty fees. Thus, ironically, Mr. Christie says,“the person guilty of communication might be Canadian ‘hate cops’ or people like Mr. Warman who download the material.|”” A further complication is that Mr. Tremaine cannot now legally add to, delete or tamper with his postings on STORMFRONT or with his website, under bail conditions relating to the Sec. 319 charges instigated by Mr. Warman. This case will be heard in Regina, June 4, 2012.