New Updates

Media

Campaigns

Newsletters

*Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism -- No Friends of
Free Discussion*

The Canadian *Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (NPCCA*)
brought down its report, July 7, and, no surprise, this self-selected
committee of anti-anti-Semites predictably found surging anti-Semitism
across Canada and especially on university campuses where many students are
concerned about the plight of the Palestinians. They complained that there
is no coherent collection of statistics on "anti-Semitism" even among hate
squads across Canada."

"The *2010 Audit* detailed 1,306 anti-Semitic incidents, representing a 3.3%
increase over the 2009 data. This continues a general upward trend. There
has been a nearly 5-fold increase in the number of anti-Semitic incidents
recorded over the past decade. The incidence of anti-Semitic incidents in
2010 was the highest on record in the 28-year history of the League’s
Audit." Actually, it's a yearly theme with this *Audit*, "anti-Semitic"
incidents are always up. However, when you get past the drama and dig a bit
deeper, for instance, of the 1135 anti-Semitic incidents reported in 2006,
just "1.2% were violent"; that works out to about 13 across this huge
Dominion. The vast majority involved graffiti" or the discovery of a leaflet
a complainant felt was critical of Jews. Nevertheless, to read the *NPCCA
Report*, you'd think the Blackshirts were back in town with a synagogue
burning on every other block.

The conclusions of this committee are laughable. They found what they set
out to find. They deliberately heard no contrary views. *CAFE* wrote a
lengthy submission in their call for papers and offered to be a witness when
they called witnesses. We were turned down. No surprise. We stood for free
speech and they didn't want to hear that. The committee didn't hear from
everyone who wanted to testify, selecting 74 witnesses from more than 150
applications. “Silva said some groups that wanted to appear before the
committee were comprised of people who condemned the panel's work from the
outset. 'I didn't really want to give a platform to individuals who had no
time for us and so why should we have time for them?' said [Vice-Chairman
and defeated *Liberal MP Mario] Silva.*" (*CBC News*, July 7, 2011)

While the committee members don't directly call for more pro-censorship
legislation, they certainly seem to approve what's there now. " One of the
most contentious issues presented to the *Inquiry Panel* focused on the role
of criminal and human rights codes in dealing with hate speech in general
and anti-Semitism in particular. This matter forms part of a larger
discussion on the extent to which hateful speech can or should be
criminalized. The *Inquiry Panel* affirms that the *Criminal Code* can serve
a useful purpose in dealing with extreme manifestations of anti-Semitism.

Some written and oral submissions argued in favour of more aggressive
prosecution of incitement to hatred, especially when advocated on the
internet. For example, *Allan Adel* of B’nai Brith argued that "Canadian
legislation should be strengthened to increase effectiveness in countering
hate on the internet and to close potential loopholes that could jeopardize
successful prosecutions."

“The debate over whether to strengthen, roll back, or even abolish *Section
13* of the *Human Rights Act* and other aspects of Canada’s hate isn’t
primarily, a debate about anti-Semitism. Rather, it is an aspect of the
ongoing debate as to what degree, in the service of reducing hate speech, it
is desirable to restrict free speech, or the extent to which it remains
constitutionally permissible to do so under the *Charter of Rights*. The
Inquiry Panel notes that the constitutionality of *Section 13* will be
decided by the *Federal* *Court of Canada* in *Lemire v. Warman*. Because of
this fact, and because opinion was so profoundly split in the testimony
presented to us, the Inquiry Panel declines to make any specific policy
recommendations on this issue."

We note that former *Julian Fantino*, wants even less control over police
laying "hate charge. " *Julian Fantino*, former *Commissioner of the Ontario
Provincial Police,* testified that police should be ‘liberated’ from the
requirement of seeking prior approval to prosecute a hate crime case" The
Loser of Caledonia, who harassed resident White dissidents, and refused to
enforce court injunctions ordering radical Indians off private property they
occupied seems particularly interested in political policing.

Lurking in the report, however, is a recommendation to bring in legislation
for further repression: "We recommend that the government move quickly to
ratify and/or enact the various international instruments dealing with
anti-Semitism (including international commitments to combat anti-Semitism
and Holocaust denial, including but not limited to, the *Berlin Declaration
on the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)* and
similar *UN* resolutions) and prepare constructive suggestions and
resolutions befitting its role as host for the 2011 conference. "

Further, "The *'Additional Protocol* to the Convention on cybercrime,
concerning the criminalization of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature
committed through computer systems,' was signed by Canada in 2005, but has
not yet been ratified. The *Additional Protocol* requires signatory states
to adopt legislation and the necessary measures to criminalize the
distribution and making available to the public racist or xenophobic
material through computer systems, intentionally and without right. It
requires member states to pass legislation that would cover racist insults
and threats. "

"Making available to the public racist or xenophobic material" would require
even further tightening of our police state anti-free speech legislation.
"Xenophobic" is the $10 word for criticism of mass foreign immigration. And
that is exactly what the government is trying to sneak into its *Omnibus
Crime Bill* set to be re-introduced this Autumn. Two amendments to Canada’s
notorious “hate law”. *Sec. 318* and 319 of the *Criminal Code* , wildly
expand the definition of “communicate” and even use the wording of the
protocol signed by our treacherous politicians; to wit, “make available.”
According to a *Library of Parliament *summary of this legislation: “*Clause
5* of the bill provides that *the offences of public incitement of hatred
and wilful promotion of hatred may be committed by any means of
communication and include making hate material available, by creating a
hyperlink that directs web surfers to a website where hate material is
posted*.”

Equally worrisome is the *Report's* support for the wildly far reaching
definition of anti-Semitism concocted by "the *European Union Monitoring
Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC),* which monitors racism and
anti-Semitism in *EU* Member States.” [Don’t these over-stuffed Euro control
freaks in Brussels have nothing else to do with their time?] It states:
"Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as
hatred towards Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism
are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property,
toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. In addition,
such manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as a
Jewish collectivity. The *CPCCA* supports and adopts the *EUMC Working
Definition of Anti-Semitism* for the purpose of this report and recommends
that the definition be adopted and promoted by the *Government of
Canada*and law enforcement agencies. The
*CPCCA* also supports the view, expressed in the report of *Britain’s
All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism in the UK*, that "*any
remark, insult or act the purpose or effect of which is to violate a Jewish
person’s dignity or create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating
or offensive environment for him is anti-Semitic."* This utterly subjective
definition would make any criticism of Israel or Jews problematic as it
might create "an intimidating ... or offensive environment."

To be fair, the *Report* does seem to agree that mere criticism of Israel
is not anti-Semitic, but there is a sneaky "but" included: "Let it be clear:
Criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, and saying so is wrong. But
singling Israel out for selective condemnation and opprobrium – let alone
denying its right to exist or seeking its destruction – is discriminatory
and hateful." Speaking of its ultimate right to exist as an exclusive Jewish
state, how does one explain to a Palestinian, Christian or Moslem, that is
was alright for foreigners to swarm into their land and eventually expel
them from large parts of it to set up their own religious state? Here's a
further question, if Jews are entitled to have their own religious state,
why can't the overwhelming Christian Majority of Canada and the U.S. insist
that this be Christian and European countries? These were perhaps the sort
of challenges the committee did not want to hear.

We suspect this vastly expanded and subjective definition of anti-Semitism
lies behind another amendment to the ”hate law.” “Hate propaganda offences
must be committed against an ‘identifiable group.’ *Clause 4* of the bill
adds ‘national origin’ to the definition of [privileged] ‘identifiable
groups.’” There has never been a more Israel Firster government in Canada.
We fear this change to the “hate law” may make criticism of Israel
increasingly dangerous and difficult

Hear Paul Fromm -- The Fighting Side of Me: Struggling for Freedom

Written by Paul Fromm

Friday, 09 September 2011 02:29

National European American Leadership Seminar September 17

Written by Paul Fromm

Friday, 09 September 2011 02:26

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
http://ymlp131.com/zEuCMn
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

National European American Leadership Seminar September 17

In just over one week, Saturday, September 17, the European American
Leadership Seminar will be held the full day and evening near
Knoxville, Tennessee. It will focus on Practical Politics and the
Tactics of White Awakening and Mobilization.
This will not a be a hand-wringing session bemoaning the sad condition
of our people and nations, but a practical seminar concentrating
solely on what we can do about it. Specifically, it concerns itself
with the high mountain highway of White preservation, renewal and
empowerment. It will deal primarily with the ideological and verbal
war against our heritage and how to counter anti-White racist
ideology and psychology pervading the media and academia. It will
focus on methods for our activists and leaders to abandon the
defensive positions of traditional conservatism and go on the
ideological and psychological offense. Also, it will teach our
people how to avoid the traps of the anti-White ideologues and show
how the anti-White minions are the true racists and hypocrites on
these critical matters. The Seminar will be interesting,
entertaining, exciting and inspiring! There will also be music and
great fellowship for like-minded people from all over the United
States and from many parts of the Western World.
The seminar is organized by dedicated activists in the Knoxville,
Tennessee area and is sponsored by Stormfront, the Don and Derek
Black Radio Show and by David Duke. Dr. Duke will be a main
presenter and will give a practical and inspiring after dinner talk
Saturday evening. The event will have interaction atmosphere with a
purposefully limited attendance. There will be lots of audience
participation and a practical workshop setup.
The speakers will include, among others, the brilliant attorney and
writer, Sam Dickson, activist Paul Fromm of Canada, European American
talk show phenom, James Edwards, the witty White activist,
philosopher, and former Washington insider Bob Whittaker, Horus the
Avenger of White Rabbit fame, along with sponsors Don and Derek Black.
Contributors will also include Dr. Ed Fields and other notable
attendees who will be announced on the Day of this exciting event.
The venue is situated in the Smokey Mountains and there are ample
opportunities for you and your family to enjoy the considerable
attractions of nature in the area. On Sunday, there will be a
Mountain walk and mountaintop discussion with Dr. Duke and Derek
Black, which promises to be a very special event which a number of
activists expect to be one of the most memorable experiences in
their life.
Registration is only $45 dollars per person for the event that will
last from 9 am Saturday, September 17, to 10 pm that evening, with a
break for a catered lunch and supper. The optional mountain walk and
session will take place Sunday morning.
To register go to http://www.stormfront.org/forum/f12-announcement75/
( http://www.stormfront.org/forum/f12-announcement75/ ).
Because of security considerations, the exact location will not be
released until just prior to the event. It is suggested that you
plan to arrive in the Knoxville area Friday evening by air or
automobile, but don't make any hotel reservations until you are
notified, so that you will find accommodation close to the venue. If
you fly into Knoxville, you may wish to arrange for a rental car in
order to reach your accommodations and the venue efficiently. Again,
you can make flight or auto trip planning now, but wait to make any
lodging reservations until we give you more details. There will be
plenty of reasonably-priced rooms available in the area close to the
event.
We look forward to seeing you there!

_____________________________
Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp131.com/u.php?id=gmjhqsqgsgbbqgyq
Powered by YourMailingListProvider

<< Start < Prev 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 Next > End >>

Page 343 of 454

Media

Campaigns

Newsletters

Most Read