Written by Paul Fromm
Tuesday, 19 January 2010 11:04
*Fast Track Haitians to Canada? Hell No!*

On January 14, it was announced that Canada would be fast tracking hundreds
perhaps thousands of "family class" immigrants from Haiti.

We oppose ANY Haitian immigration to Canada. We've already contributed
$555.000.000 in foreign aid (from 2006-2011), plus $55-million more in
disaster relief after the recent earthquake. Immigration to Canada is no
solution to Haitian corruption and incompetence.

With 8.2% unemployment, Canada doesn't need ANY immigrants.

It's urgent that you do the following:

1. Phone, then write a letter (postage free in Canada) to your Member of
Parliament and let him/her know you don't want Haitians fast tracked to
Canada.. Your MP's addresss is

c/o House of Commons,
Ottawa, ON,
K1A 0A6

2. Phone, then write a letter to Hon. Jason Kenney, Minister of Immigration

*Constituency Office:*

1168 137 Ave SE
Calgary, AB
T2J 6T6
P. 403-225-3480
F. 403-225-3504

*Ottawa Office:*

325 East Block
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
P. 613-992-2235
F. 613-992-1920

[email protected]

3. Join our Facebook protest group:
Written by Paul Fromm
Tuesday, 19 January 2010 07:23
*What is "Political Correctness"?*

*William S. Lind*

Most Americans look back on the 1950s as a good time. Our homes were safe,
to the point where many people did not bother to lock their doors. Public
schools were generally excellent, and their problems were things like
talking in class and running in the halls. Most men treated women like
ladies, and most ladies devoted their time and effort to making good homes,
rearing their children well and helping their communities through volunteer
work. Children grew up in two-parent households, and the mother was there to
meet the child when he came home from school. Entertainment was something
the whole family could enjoy.

*What happened?*

If a man from America of the 1950s were suddenly introduced into America in
the 2000s, he would hardly recognize it as the same country. He would be in
immediate danger of getting mugged, carjacked or worse, because he would not
have learned to live in constant fear. He would not know that he shouldn't
go into certain parts of the city, that his car must not only be locked but
equipped with an alarm, that he dare not go to sleep at night without
locking the windows and bolting the doors - and setting the electronic
security system.

If he brought his family with him, he and his wife would probably cheerfully
pack their children off to the nearest public school. When the children came
home in the afternoon and told them they had to go through a metal detector
to get in the building, had been given some funny white powder by another
kid and learned that homosexuality is normal and good, the parents would be

In the office, the man might light up a cigarette, drop a reference to the
"little lady," and say he was happy to see the firm employing some Negroes
in important positions. Any of those acts would earn a swift reprimand, and
together they might get him fired.

When she went into the city to shop, the wife would put on a nice suit, hat,
and possibly gloves. She would not understand why people stared, and mocked.

And when the whole family sat down after dinner and turned on the
television, they would not understand how pornography from some sleazy,
blank-fronted "Adults Only" kiosk had gotten on their set.

Were they able, our 1950s family would head back to the 1950s as fast as
they could, with a gripping horror story to tell. Their story would be of a
nation that had decayed and degenerated at a fantastic pace, moving in less
than a half a century from the greatest country on earth to a Third World
nation, overrun by crime, noise, drugs and dirt. The fall of Rome was
graceful by comparison.

*Why did it happen?*

Over the last forty years, America has been conquered by the same force that
earlier took over Russia, China, Germany and Italy. That force is ideology.
Here, as elsewhere, ideology has inflicted enormous damage on the
traditional culture it came to dominate, fracturing it everywhere and
sweeping much of it away. In its place came fear, and ruin. Russia will take
a generation or more to recover from Communism, if it ever can.

The ideology that has taken over America goes most commonly by the name of
"Political Correctness." Some people see it as a joke. It is not. It is
deadly serious. It seeks to alter virtually all the rules, formal and
informal, that govern relations among people and institutions. It wants to
change behavior, thought, even the words we use. To a significant extent, it
already has. Whoever or whatever controls language also controls thought.
Who dares to speak of "ladies" now?

Just what is "Political Correctness?" Political Correctness is in fact
cultural Marxism - Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. The
effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture did not begin with
the student rebellion of the 1960s. It goes back at least to the 1920s and
the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany,
a group of Marxists founded an institute devoted to making the transition,
the Institute of Social Research (later known as the Frankfurt School). One
of its founders, George Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the
question, "Who shall save us from Western Civilization?" The Frankfurt
School gained profound influence in American universities after many of its
leading lights fled to the United States in the 1930s to escape National
Socialism in Germany.

The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some
Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create "Critical Theory"
and "deconstruction." These in turn greatly influenced education theory, and
through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call
"Political Correctness." The lineage is clear, and it is traceable right
back to Karl Marx.

The parallels between the old, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism are
evident. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, shares with classical
Marxism the vision of a "classless society," i.e., a society not merely of
equal opportunity, but equal condition. Since that vision contradicts human
nature - because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of
the starting point - society will not accord with it unless forced. So,
under both variants of Marxism, it is forced. This is the first major
parallel between classical and cultural Marxism: both are totalitarian
ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness can be seen on
campuses where "PC" has taken over the college: freedom of speech, of the
press, and even of thought are all eliminated.

The second major parallel is that both classical, economic Marxism and
cultural Marxism have single-factor explanations of history. Classical
Marxism argues that all of history was determined by ownership of the means
of production. Cultural Marxism says that history is wholly explained by
which groups - defined by sex, race, and sexual normality or abnormality -
have power over which other groups.

The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups
virtuous and others evil a priori, that is, without regard for the actual
behavior of individuals. Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as
virtuous and the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital
as evil. Cultural Marxism defines blacks, Hispanics, Feminist women,
homosexuals and some additional minority groups as virtuous and white men as
evil. (Cultural Marxism does not recognize the existence of non-Feminist
women, and defines blacks who reject Political Correctness as whites).

The fourth parallel is in means: expropriation. Economic Marxists, where
they obtained power, expropriated the property of the bourgeoisie and handed
it to the state, as the "representative" of the workers and the peasants.
Cultural Marxists, when they gain power (including through our own
government), lay penalties on white men and others who disagree with them
and give privileges to the groups they favor. Affirmative action is an

Finally, both varieties of Marxists employ a method of analysis designed to
show the correctness of their ideology in every situation. For classical
Marxists, the analysis is economic. For cultural Marxists, the analysis is
linguistic: deconstruction. Deconstruction "proves" that any "text," past or
present, illustrates the oppression of blacks, women, homosexuals, etc. by
reading that meaning into words of the text (regardless of their actual
meaning). Both methods are, of course, phony analyses that twist the
evidence to fit preordained conclusions, but they lend a 'scientific" air to
the ideology.

These parallels are neither remarkable nor coincidental. They exist because
Political Correctness is directly derived from classical Marxism, and is in
fact a variant of Marxism. Through most of the history of Marxism, cultural
Marxists were "read out" of the movement by classical, economic Marxists.
Today, with economic Marxism dead, cultural Marxism has filled its shoes.
The medium has changed, but the message is the same: a society of radical
egalitarianism enforced by the power of the state.

Political Correctness now looms over American society like a colossus. It
has taken over both political parties - recent Republican conventions were
choreographed according to its dictates, while cultural conservatives were
shown the door - and is enforced by many laws and government regulations. It
controls the most powerful element in our culture, the entertainment
industry. It dominates both public and higher education: many a college
campus is a small, ivy-covered North Korea. It has even captured the higher
clergy in many Christian churches. Anyone in the Establishment who departs
from its dictates swiftly ceases to be a member of the Establishment.

The remainder of this short book will explore the subject of Political
Correctness further: its history, its method of analysis (deconstruction),
and the means by which it has attained its influence, especially through

But one more question must be addressed at the outset, the most vital
question: how can Americans combat Political Correctness and retake their
society from the cultural Marxists?

It is not sufficient just to criticize Political Correctness. It tolerates a
certain amount of criticism., even gentle mocking. It does so through no
genuine tolerance for other points of view, but in order to disarm its
opponents, to let itself seem less menacing than it is. The cultural
Marxists do not yet have total power, and they are too wise to appear
totalitarian until their victory is assured.

Rather, those who would defeat cultural Marxism must defy it. They must use
words it forbids, and refuse to use the words it mandates; remember, sex is
better than gender. They must shout from the housetops the realities it
seeks to suppress, such as the facts that violent crime is
disproportionately committed by blacks and that most cases of AIDS are
voluntary, i.e., acquired from immoral sexual acts. They must refuse to turn
their children over to public schools.

Above all, those who would defy Political Correctness must behave according
to the old rules of our culture, not the new rules the cultural Marxists lay
down. Ladies should be wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men
should still hold doors open for ladies. Children should not be born out of
wedlock. Open homosexuality should be shunned. Jurors should not accept race
as an excuse for murder.

Defiance spreads. When other Americans see one person defy Political
Correctness and survive - and you still can, for now - they are emboldened.
They are tempted to defy it, too, and some do. The ripples from a single act
of defiance, of one instance of walking up to the clay idol and breaking off
its nose, can range far. There is nothing the Politically Correct fear more
than open defiance, and for good reason; it is their chief vulnerability.
That should lead cultural conservatives to defy cultural Marxism at every

While the hour is late, the battle is not decided. Very few Americans
realize that Political Correctness is in fact Marxism in a different set of
clothes. As that realization spreads, defiance will spread with it. At
present, Political Correctness prospers by disguising itself. Through
defiance, and through education on our own part (which should be part of
every act of defiance), we can strip away its camouflage and reveal the
Marxism beneath the window-dressing of "sensitivity," "tolerance," and
Written by Paul Fromm
Wednesday, 13 January 2010 10:13
Multicultural Chocolate Cake: Cake sprinkled with faeces

Cake sprinkled with faeces, nothing tops the enrichment brought to us by a

Eating s... - what a wonderful experience of multicultural enrichment. It
must have been a vicious exenophile for not appreciating such an enriching
multicultural "chocolate cake" experience. How spiteful to report this to
the public health department, pure race hate.

11 Februar 2008

Shop-owners sold chocolate cake sprinkled with human faeces

Two shop-owners were today fined for selling chocolate cake - which had been
sprinkled with human faeces.

A horrified customer ate the foul-smelling gateaux but noticed that it
didn't taste or smell "quite right" and handed the cake to public health

The analysts soon established that the sweet treat was covered in faeces and
legal proceedings against the shop owners were started.

Multicultural chocolate cake, sprinkled with human faeces. This must be the
sort of racial enrichment do-gooders fervently longing for!

Shop owners Saeed Hasmi, 25, and Jan Yadgari, 23, were fined £1,500 for
selling food unfit for human consumption.

The pair - who ran the Italiano Pizzeria in Roath, Cardiff - admitted the
charge but did not say how the chocolate cake was contaminated.

The takeaway is a favourite with late-night revellers and students living
around the takeaway close to Cardiff University.

A spokeswoman for the public health department in Cardiff City Council said:
*"The person who bought the cake realised it didn't taste or smell quite
right so they reported it to us.*

"Subsequent examination by the public analyst and national public health
service laboratories confirmed the presence of faecal matter.

"There were bits of it all over the top of the cake.

"We cannot say for definite what kind of faecal matter it is, although it is
very likely it was human. It would have to go through a DNA test for us to
know for absolutely sure."

Hasmi and Yadgari at first denied the charge but pleaded guilty at Cardiff
magistrates court before the trial.

Hasmi, of Roath, Cardiff, and Yadgari, of Adamsdown, Cardiff, were each
fined £1,500 and ordered to pay £200 costs.

After the case Hasmi said: *"It was not our fault but I don't want to talk
about it.*

"I'm not working in the food industry anymore. I want to do something else.

*"We are sorry for the people who ate it,"* he said.

The case has taken 18 months to come to court and the pair have both left
the Pizzeria.

Shams Mehrabi, who took over the Italiano Pizzeria in March, condemned the
actions of the two men. He now has hygiene certificates on the wall and
said: "I have the highest standards.

"This is a completely different business now. We have a lot of happy
customers - we won't be selling chocolate cake
Page 418 of 454
Powered by MMS Blog