Muslim Hate Speech and Arthur Topham: The deception of "Hate Speech" Laws

Written by Paul Fromm

Friday, 09 November 2012 19:06

*Muslim Hate Speech and Arthur Topham: * *The deception of "Hate Speech" Laws***** <http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/11/doug-christie-on-suntv-authur-topham.html> **** *[VIDEO]Doug Christie with Ezra Levant discussing * *the Arthur Topham Case and “hate speech” Laws** [Click to watch]*** ** ** ** ** * http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/11/doug-christie-on-suntv-authur-topham.html * *.* * http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/11/muslim-hate-speech-and-authur-topham.html * ** ** ** ** ** ** You can find out more about the Topham case at http://www.radicalpress.com. Topham was charged under Canada's ridiculous criminal "hate" law - Section 319 of the Criminal Code. This nutty law tries to control human emotions, and as the norm for so-called "hate" laws ... *only applies to one certain type of opinion*. When "hate" is promoted in Canada, it is only criminalized if the communicator of the message is an alleged "nazi" or white "anti-Semite". Just look at all the cases stretching back to the 1970's. If you hate *whitey *-- no problem. If you are Muslim and hate Jews -- no problem. If you are Jewish and hate Muslims -- no problem. *Here is proof of my point:* On the same day that white skinned - alleged "nazi" and "anti-Semite" Arthur Topham was charged with criminal 'hate speech", the police looked at brown skinned Muslim hate against Jewish Canadians, and found no criminal "hate". In the *Alice in Wonderland* world of human rights and 'hate speech" ... some "hate" is criminal, while other "hate" is just fine.**** <http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ic03Zvc7cn4/UJyskMRH_2I/AAAAAAAAA6U/YSMM0vdGxVU/s1600/Toronto+Islamic+School+will+not+face+charges.jpg> **** Lets compare for a second, what Arthur Topham wrote to what was "anti-Jewish Curriculum" at the East end Toronto Madrassah. One was criminalized, the other was not. Arthur Topham posted on his website:**** It’s been ongoing since the day I first openly *criticized the Zionist Jews and their political dogma or ideology known as Zionism*. That was back during the heady last days of the 20th Century when I was publishing my monthly hard copy edition of* The Radical*, an alternative tabloid which ran for forty-two consecutive editions ending in June of 2002. ..**** And from the National Post which described what Topham allegedly said and did<http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/06/b-c-man-charged-with-promoting-hatred-against-jews-on-website/> :**** ** ** The *Biological Jew depicts Jews as parasites that suck the blood from their “host”societies* while the Protocols is a fraudulent book that purports to describe a *conspiracy for worldwide Jewish domination*. .. Police arrested Mr. Topham and questioned him on May 16. According to a transcript of his police interview that was posted online, he asked the investigating officer, Det. Const. Terry Wilson of the B.C. Hate Crime Team, whether he had been *trained in Tel Aviv or whether Mossad had come to Canada to train him*. He lectured the officer about how *Jews “control what you’re doing”* and said they had “created the unit you’re working for.” He asked the officer if he was a Christian and scolded him for what he was doing. “*These guys have spent the last 2,000 years trying to destroy our religion, * and you like a Judas are out here like a, like one of their dogs chasing down people who are trying to defend the Christian religion,” he said. “You ought to be ashamed of yourself.”**** Now lets compare what the Muslim's East end Madrassah (Toronto) allegedly taught to children in their *Curriculum.*This again is quotes from the National Post's article (published Nov 8, 2012)<http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/08/toronto-islamic-school-will-not-face-charges-over-anti-jewish-curriculum-police/>. I can not actually verify their authenticity:**** “*End of Jewish Plots and Treacheries*: Ever since the Prophet’s entry into Madina, the *treacherous Jews* had vehemently opposed him and his Islamic call, evoking memories of their hostility to the previous Prophet, Jesus Christ, half a millennium ago. The *crafty Jews* entered into an alliance with the polytheist Quraish in a bid to stamp out Islam. *They conspired to kill Prophet Muhammad* despite the fact that he was lenient towards them and had treated them kindly, hoping to convince them of Islam’s truth. But eventually as *Jewish plots and aggressions* increased, he had no choice other than to take up arms against them, in order to protect Islam and the Muslims. At the battle of Khaiber which is famous for Imam Ali’s heroic exploits, *the Prophet defeated them ending Jewish intrigues and conspiracies* in Arabia.” [Emphasis added]**** **<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IFX895QMuzk/UJyxBYlxIpI/AAAAAAAAA6k/6xLUYtDzGfc/s1600/Toronto+Islamic+School+will+not+face+charges+-+excepts.jpg> **<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IFX895QMuzk/UJyxBYlxIpI/AAAAAAAAA6k/6xLUYtDzGfc/s1600/Toronto+Islamic+School+will+not+face+charges+-+excepts.jpg><http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IFX895QMuzk/UJyxBYlxIpI/AAAAAAAAA6k/6xLUYtDzGfc/s1600/Toronto+Islamic+School+will+not+face+charges+-+excepts.jpg> **** ** ** Why is it that so-called "hate" laws only ever target one certain opinion, and all the other haters are given a free pass? Would Canada's criminal prohibition against "hate" ever be found constitutional if the courts looked at the actual effects and operation of the law? After 30 years, it is as clear as day; this law targets a certain range of opinions in Canada, and has little to do with actually removing hate. As we have documented over and over, some hate in Canada is perfectly fine and non-criminal. If you have an opinion which can be classified as "nazi" or "anti-Semitic" and you're White; expect the state to drop the *'trifecta of tolerance' *of you. Which is a three stage, proven framework, to break and humiliate the victim -- all at the expense of Canadian taxpayers who foot the bill for this multi-million dollar make-work project. The stages can be defined as: *ostracized, vilified and criminalized*. Section 319 of the Criminal Code is an affront to justice and freedom in Canada and should be repealed immediately. Canada is a tolerant country with intelligent people, and we do not need the nanny state (at the behest of special interest groups and plaintiffs of fortune) looking over the shoulders of people and parsing the words of individuals that wish to express non-violent opinions on controversial subjects as race or religion. *We have tried the censorship of criminal and civil prohibition's<http://www.stopsection13.com/>against "hate" speech<http://www.stopsection13.com/>since the 1970's with little positive effect. * * * *Isn't it time to give freedom a chance?***** ** ** -Marc Lemire**** *Free Speech Activist and the only ***** *Canadian to ever win <http://www.freedomsite.org/legal> a Section 13 case*

 

Another Dissident Victim: Arthur Topham Charged With "Hate" for Internet Postings

Written by Paul Fromm

Wednesday, 07 November 2012 19:56

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp218.net/zTeA4b -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Another Dissident Victim: Arthur Topham Charged With "Hate" for Internet Postings Make no mistake about it: It's dangerous to be a strong critic of Israel in Canada. The long arm of political Zionism reaches deep within governments in Canada. A once free nation was saddled with the "hate law", Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, after more than 30 years of lobbying by the Canadian Jewish Congress. The process works this way, as lawyer Doug Christie has frequently explained: demonize, ostracize, then criminalize. The victim is the subject of a series of one-sided press articles. Friends and potential allies shy away, thinking "I don't want my name associated with things like that. I can't afford publicity like what he's getting." Now, vilified and isolated, the friendless victim is marched off to court for his final destruction. Notice in the National Post and Sun Media articles below, Mr. Topham is never interviewed nor is a spokesman say, for a free speech organization like CAFE. Arthur Topham has been a strong critic of Zionism for almost 15 years, through radicalpress, which was first a newspaper and, of latter years, a website and blog. After a six month RCMP "Hate squad" (thought crimes) investigation and while labouring under an Internet gag order, Arthur Topham has been charged under Canada's notorious "hate" law. In an e-mail sent out earlier this week, Mr. Topham indicated that he expects to be arrested. He will appear in court on November 8 to seek bail. He fears the Crown will seek a severe gag order. Until a few weeks ago, he wasn't even allowed to send out e-mail and, of course, his computers had been seized by the police. What a country! When you watch the pukesome The Charter: Let's Discuss It (http://charterproject.ca) ads on television, with their earnestly politically correct types breathlessly enthusing how Trudeau's 30-year old document ensures our rights, scream back, "What About Arthur Topham?" The Charter was a legal coup d'etat. It stripped us of individual rights and conferred group rights. If you're not a member of a privilged group, you're out of luck. The well meaning fools think they enjoy freedom of speech and other rights. They haven't read the weasel clause which says you have these rights unless Parliament or a provincial legislature decides to restrict them for some good reason, of course,or, as the Charter expresses it, "a reasonable limit in a free and democratic society." "Democratic" cancels free, because if an elected or even appointed body approves the restriction, it's "democratic.| Mr. Topham's tormenters, the complainants, are Harry Abrams, a longtime B'nai Brith operative in Victoria, and serial complainant Richard Warman, who somehow found time while doing whatever he does for the Department of National Defence, to investigate Mr. Topham and file yet another complaint. According to the National Post (November 6, 2012): "Mr. Warman’s complaint said both the Biological Jew and the Protocols were banned from import into Canada as hate propaganda. 'When you’ve got that kind of just rabid attack against the Jewish community I think it’s incumbent on people to stand up in society,' said Mr. Warman, who regularly files complaints about racist websites." Notice, it's really about silencing views, racist or anti-Zionist, Warman doesn't like. Warman wants people to stand up. Fair enough. Why not write a critique pointing out exactly where The Biolgical Jew or the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are wrong. That's how debate should occur in a free society. Also being banned as "hate propaganda" by the Customs Canada censors doens't imply the book was ever given a hearing. There was never a trial. Some bureaucrat made a ruling. If you want to help Arthur Topham, here are his instructions: "I would also ask of you that you hang on to the website url to the following blog which contains my PayPal account. I will most likely need this to help in soliciting for donations to pay legal costs. The url is http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com ( http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com/ ) and the PayPal button is on the top right hand corner of the home page. Anyone wishing to send financial assistance via Canada Post can send it to: Arthur Topham 4633 Barkerville Hwy Quesnel, B.C. CANADA V2J 6T8" Paul Fromm Director CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION INFORMATION Court Identifier:5921:PRA Court File Number:25166 Type Reference: Inf. Seq Number:5 Agency File Number: RMCS:11-4897 DNA: [X] "By Indictment" This is the information of Marina Onciul, a Court Liaison Officer (the "Informant") of Quesnel, British Columbia. The informant says that the informant has reasonable grounds to believe and does believe that Count 1 Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, ink the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code. Count 2 Roy Arthur TOPHAM, on or about the 4th day of May, 2012, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did store firearms, in a manner contrary to the regulations under Storage, Display, Transportation and Handling of Firearms by Individual Regulations made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act, contrary to Section 86(2) of the Criminal Code. THE INFORMATION SWORN ON NOVEMBER 5, 2012 CONTAINS A TOTAL OF 2 COUNTS ON 1 PAGE. SWORN BEFORE ME ON 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 AT QUESNEL BRITISH COLUMBIA D. Carey2012.11.05 10 ( tel:2012.11.05%2010 ):43:46 -08'00' A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE IN AND FOR THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Roy Arthur TOPHAM: Warrant PROCESS CONFIRMED D. Carey2012.11.05 10 ( tel:2012.11.05%2010 ):44:10 -08'00' A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE IN AND FOR THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp218.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqghbbgguewwmw Powered by YourMailingListProvider

 

Diversity may be fatal, says new government health study

Written by Paul Fromm

Wednesday, 07 November 2012 19:54

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp218.net/zJsKFn -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I SUSPECT THE HEALTH EFFECTS ON WHITES, THE VICTIMS OF THIS GOVERNMENT SANCTIONED AND ORGANIZED THIRD WORLD INVASION AND REPLACEMENT OF THE FOUNDING/SETTLER PEOPLE, MUST BE EVEN WORSE. -- PAUL FROMM DIVERSITY MAY BE FATAL, SAYS NEW GOVERNMENT HEALTH STUDY 1:42 AM 10/27/2012 in Share0 ( http://dailycaller.com/email-this/?postid=3470153 ) Neil Munro * Diversity may be killing older African-Americans and Hispanics, according to a new peer-reviewed study published in the America Journal of Public Health, which shows that people suffer less cancer and heart disease when they live among their racial or ethnic peers. “Living in an ethnically dense neighborhood is beneficial when it comes to heart disease and cancer,” said Kimberly Alvarez, a co-author of the new study, which was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Alvarez’s phrase, “ethnically dense,” describes a community in which at least 50 percent of people are from the same ethnic group. Many progressive groups advocate the use of government to increase diversity in housing, education, health care and other sectors. Alvarez’s study reviewed the health records of 2,367 Mexican-Americans and 2,790 African-Americans older than 65, and concluded they lived longer if they inhabited a community mostly populated by their group. African-Americans “living in a county with an ethnic density of 50% or more … were 46% less likely to report doctor-diagnosed heart disease and 77% less likely to report cancer than those who lived in an ethnic density of less than 25%,” said a summary of the report, authored by Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. (RELATED: Living in an Ethnically Homogenous Neighborhood Boosts Health of U.S. Minority Seniors ( http://www.mailman.columbia.edu/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors )) The Mexican-Americans in the study “were 33% and 62% less likely to report heart disease and cancer, respectively,” when more than half of their neighbors were similar to them ethnically. The reduced death rate in “ethnically dense” neighborhoods may occur because similar neighbors are “likely to share values like respect for elders and have close-knit family structures,” said Becca Levy, a study co-author and an associate professor of Epidemiology and Psychology at the Yale School of Public Health. Earlier studies showed high levels of social support within communities of Hispanic immigrants, said Alvarez, and “these networks may facilitate better health behaviors and, in turn, better health outcomes.” Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/27/diversity-may-be-fatal-says-new-government-health-study/#ixzz2BKjRd3ip ( http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/27/diversity-may-be-fatal-says-new-government-health-study/#ixzz2BKjRd3ip ) _____________________________ Unsubscribe / Change Profile: http://ymlp218.net/ugmjhqsqgsgbbqghbhgguewwmw Powered by YourMailingListProvider