Freedom Wins: Wildrose Party Vows to Scrap Alberta Human Rights Commission
Written by Paul Fromm
Monday, 27 June 2011 20:39
*Freedom Wins: Wildrose Party Vows to Scrap Alberta Human Rights Commission*
*By many accounts, the upstart populist Wildrose Party may well win the next
provincial election in Alberta and replace the tired, interventionist,
deficit ridden "Progressive Conservatives" under the lack lustre Premier Ed
*Thus, it's hopeful news that to answer the question, "What are you guys
going to do differently?" the Wildrose Party's weekend policy conference in
Calgary promised to rid the province of the wildly anti-freedom human rights
*The Calgary Herald (June 26, 2011) reported: "*A Wildrose Alliance
government would scrap the 'kangaroo court' Alberta Human Rights Commission.
... The Stelmach government immediately condemned the Wildrose policy to axe
the commission as 'ludicrous' and one that would fail to adequately protect
the human rights of Albertans."

In fact, the Alberta Human Rights Commission has repeatedly and flagrantly
tried to silence populists, immigration critics and people leery of the
homosexual agenda. In the early '90s, they urged hotels in Edmonton not to
permit meetings of the Canadian League of Rights, who were discussing the
Canadian Constitution (for God's sake), as they, it was said, had been a
"magnet for violence." In fact, the only disturbances had been created by
small protests instigated by a communist professor in B.C, who had made the
complaint to the AHRC in the first place! No, Premier Stelmach, the Alberta
Human Rights Commission is a menace to the rights of freedom of speech of
all Albertans!

"In a decision that’s already sparking controversy, Wildrose members —
including leader Danielle Smith — overwhelmingly voted to disband the
Alberta Human Rights Commission, but keep the overarching legislation in
place and allow complaints to be dealt with by the courts.
'The human rights commissions have discredited themselves over the last
number of years,' Smith told reporters at the Telus Convention Centre.
She said the Alberta commission has taken on 'frivolous cases,' demonstrated
the person charged under them is presumed guilty and left innocent people
with hefty legal bills. 'I have to respect the views of my members on this,'
Smith added."

Indeed, despite Premier Stelmach's statement, the *Herald* reports: "Some
Tory MLAs and other organizations believe the Alberta Human Rights
Commission has been used as a system to harass people."

And more good news for free expression: " In Saskatchewan, Premier Brad Wall
and his government have introduced legislation that would abolish that
province’s human rights tribunal."

Paul Fromm

By Jason Fekete, *Calgary Herald* June 26, 2011

*Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith took aim at the Alberta Human Rights
Commission on Saturday.
*Photograph by: Stuart Gradon, Calgary Herald
A Wildrose Alliance government would scrap the “kangaroo court” Alberta
Human Rights Commission, promote private, not-for-profit hospitals in a
publicly funded system and appoint a chief firearms officer.
The Stelmach government immediately condemned the Wildrose policy to axe the
commission as “ludicrous” and one that would fail to adequately protect the
human rights of Albertans.
More than 500 Wildrose members gathered in Calgary this weekend for the
party’s annual convention to prepare candidates and organizers for the next
provincial election, which could come as early as this fall.
But they also voted Saturday on a few dozen policy resolutions that
distinguish the party from its main rival, the ruling Progressive
In a decision that’s already sparking controversy, Wildrose members —
including leader Danielle Smith — overwhelmingly voted to disband the
Alberta Human Rights Commission, but keep the overarching legislation in
place and allow complaints to be dealt with by the courts.
“The human rights commissions have discredited themselves over the last
number of years,” Smith told reporters at the Telus Convention Centre.
She said the Alberta commission has taken on “frivolous cases,” demonstrated
the person charged under them is presumed guilty and left innocent people
with hefty legal bills. “I have to respect the views of my members on this,”
Smith added.
Some Tory MLAs and other organizations believe the Alberta Human Rights
Commission has been used as a system to harass people. In Saskatchewan,
Premier Brad Wall and his government have introduced legislation that would
abolish that province’s human rights tribunal.
The Stelmach government has previously suggested the commission had missed
its mandate and was becoming a “kangaroo court.”
The province introduced a number of reforms to strengthen the quasi-judicial
body, including hiring retired Court of Queen’s Bench judge David Blair
Mason as commission chief and introducing reforms to address so-called
frivolous cases.
“It’s pretty ludicrous to say we can’t improve the human rights commission,
we have to throw in the towel and abolish it,” said Culture Minister Lindsay
Blackett, the minister responsible for the commission.
It’s extremely expensive for complainants and respondents to go through the
formal courts, which actually dissuades people from raising legitimate
cases, he said.
The human rights commission isn’t necessarily designed to protect freedom of
speech as many Wildrose members demand, he said. Rather, it’s meant to
protect Albertans from discrimination, which will be all the more important
as immigrants continue to flock to the province for jobs, he explained.
“To do what they’re talking about is ridiculous,” Blackett added.
The cause celebre on the issue is the case of conservative commentator Ezra
Levant, who had his own lengthy battle with the provincial human rights
A case against Levant was brought forth by Calgary Imam Syed Soharwardy, who
complained that Levant’s decision to publish Danish cartoons of the Prophet
Muhammad in the Western Standard magazine in 2006 was an affront to his
human rights. Soharwardy eventually dropped his complaint after two years,
although an Edmonton Muslim group filed a similar one that went through the
commission before Levant was eventually let off, albeit with a $100,000
legal tab.
Levant said Saturday the Wildrose party’s policy decision “is a reflection
that things are out of sync” and that it’s too easy to bring forward
nuisance cases against innocent people.
“I believe this is politically saleable,” Levant said at the convention.
Wildrose members also passed a couple of intriguing health-care policies,
including for the government to “strongly encourage private, not-for-profit
hospitals to operate within the publicly funded health system.”
Smith said members have clearly stated they prefer competitive delivery and
a variety of different health-care providers, including public and private
In a move that also won strong support from members, a Wildrose government
would repeal controversial power line and land-use legislation passed by the
Stelmach government, including bills 50, 19 and 36.
The party also passed a policy supporting the rights of firearms owners,
stern sentencing for violent crimes involving guns and the need to appoint a
chief firearms officer in Alberta. “I don’t think there’s anything passed
today that I won’t be able to defend,” Smith said.
Wildrosers took a moderate position on some environmental policies,
rejecting a resolution that would have scrapped current policies calling for
“more efficient resource recovery methods” and environmentally responsible
energy development.
On the fiscal side, the party axed a current policy that would allow a
Wildrose government to tap the Heritage Fund when provincial GDP growth is
less than two per cent.
[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald
Slumping White Birthrates Finally Getting Attention of Establishment Politicians
Written by Paul Fromm
Sunday, 26 June 2011 03:21
*Slumping White Birthrates Finally Getting Attention of Establishment

*It seems like the low White birthrates in Europe have finally caught the
attention of some politicians in Washington. Of course they don't talk about
it as being a problem for our race but rather as a future obstacle to
economic growth.

I knew Congressman Chris Smith (R-New Jersey) during my Washington days. He
first came to the House as a youthful right-to-life advocate, ousting an
incumbent involved in the "Ab-Scam" investigation. His voting record is that
of a conventional conservative Republican. Note his concern about
"xenophobic and ultranationalist violence."

This is about as close as U.S. establishment politicians will come to
addressing what is the foremost challenge to our people. At least the issue
is being taken seriously for a change. Numerous European countries are,
piecemeal, offering incentives to families for having two or more children.
Note the quotation from Polybius at the end.

Much as the 'implosion' of the old Soviet Union was not anticipated by the
so-called experts, the White West could be in for sweeping (unanticipated)
changes in policy and leadership. Stay tuned.

Louis T. March
Rockbridge Baths, VA 24473

‘Europe is dying’ U.S. population expert tells Senate hearing*
by Thaddeus Baklinski
Tue Jun 21, 2011 13:50 EST
Comments (7)
Tags: chris smith, population control, steve mosher

Population Research Institute (PRI) President Steven Mosher

WASHINGTON DC, June 21, 2011 ( – Given the precipitous
decline in the birthrates of European countries, all anti-natal programs
funded by the United States should immediately be replaced by pro-natal
programs, one top population expert recently told the U.S. Senate.

“It doesn’t matter whether we call them reproductive health programs, family
planning programs, or population control programs,” said Stephen Mosher,
president of the Population Research Institute (PRI). “They all have the
same effect: they force down the birth rate in countries that are already
dying. Such programs are only making a bad problem worse.”

The hearing before the Senate Commission on Security and Cooperation in
Europe focused on the implications for the security, as well as the economic
and social developments in Europe, due to demographic decline marked by
diminishing and rapidly aging populations, in most of the Organization for
Security and Co-operation in Europe’s (OSCE) 56 participating states.

Commission Chairman, Rep. Chris Smith noted that the member states - every
country of Europe and the former Soviet Union, as well as the U.S. and
Canada - are already seeing dramatic demographic changes that are “sure to
have dramatic consequences for the security, economic, and human dimensions
of the OSCE.”

“The fact is that most OSCE countries are in demographic decline, many of
them in rapid decline. Only a handful of the OSCE’s 56 member states are at
or above replacement level,” Smith observed.

Mosher agreed. “Five centuries after the Black Plague devastated Europe, a
White Pestilence is now decimating that same continent,” he said. “Many
nations, especially in Europe, are already in a death spiral, losing a
significant number of people each year. Listen closely, and you will hear
the muffled sound of populations crashing.”

The commission heard that the pattern of demographic decline will likely
have significant social, economic and security consequences for countries
throughout the region. States will become increasingly dependent upon
foreign workers in the coming decades, while there will be a dramatic
decrease in the pool of potential recruits for military service, resulting
in mounting social tensions “as demonstrated by clashes in some
participating States in recent years,” according to Smith.

“It is alarming and sad to see xenophobic and ultranationalist violence
fueled by one nation’s perceptions of long-term decline vis-a-vis another
group,” Smith said.

“Likewise with the economy,” Smith continued. “It is far from clear how, in
many of the most rapidly declining countries, how economic growth can be
sustained by a declining population - or, to touch on the most pressing
specific, how the numerically smaller younger generations will even begin to
provide for the larger older generations.”

Steven Mosher, whose presentation to the Commission concluded that the
downward spiral of fertility decline and resulting demographic collapse is
almost beyond reversal, began his address with a quote from ancient Greece:

“One remarks nowadays all over Greece such a diminution in natality and in
general manner such depopulation that the towns are deserted and the fields
lie fallow. Although this country has not been ravaged by wars or epidemics,
the cause of the harm is evident: by avarice or cowardice the people, if
they marry, will not bring up the children they ought to have. At most they
bring up one or two. It is in this way that the scourge before it is noticed
is rapidly developed. The remedy is in ourselves; we have but to change our
morals.” (Polybius, 204-122 B.C.)
We Shall Prevail -- Address by Louis T. March
Written by Paul Fromm
Friday, 24 June 2011 22:31
We Shall Prevail

*Address by Louis T. March

Council of Conservative Citizens

June 11, 2011

It is an honor to address the Council of Conservative Citizens--a group that
with the

leadership of Gordon Baum, Bill Lord, A.J. Barker, Tom Dover, David Hill and

has played a leading and honorable role in the defense of our people and

Think about it: not much more than half a century ago, the West dominated
the globe

with a military and economic hegemony that seemed invincible. But today

Civilization is in an existential struggle, flooded with immigration from
the Third World.

Sadly, many Whites welcome this invasion or lack the moral fiber to resist
it. But in an

era when the blind self-indulgence of so many of our fellow Whites aided the

against our civilization, *members of the Council spoke up in defense of our
people. *In the

face of withering criticism from the mainstream media, the Council of

Citizens has stood firm.

When we talk about “prevailing,” we are speaking of “victory.” To speak of
victory it

helps to know something of defeat as those of us who spring from the South
know by

heritage and tradition. Yet as wrenching as was the dashing of Southern
hopes at

Appomattox, and as outrageous as the bayonet-imposed “Reconstruction”
regime, those

defeats will have been trifles compared to our current challenge, and what
will surely

come if the men and women of the West fail *to *oppose it, to defeat it, to
destroy it*. We*

*shall ultimately prevail, because we must.*

Whom do I mean by “we”?

As most of us know, unlike the African-Americans, Asian-Americans, and

Americans of today’s diversity riddled America, many Whites, or

disdain the very notion of any racial identity. Some endorse Martin Luther
King’s famous

hope that everyone will be judged by the content of their character. If only
that were the

case! After all, when you fill in an application for a government job,
housing loan,

college scholarship or most anything else, you will find several boxes that

different nonwhite groups, but you will look in vain for a box to check for

But there’s more to racial identity than resistance. Long before the
founding of our

republic, all White Americans knew they shared bonds of blood and culture

transcended borders. This set them apart from the non-Europeans. Despite
wars and

revolutions, Whites around the world continue to share this kinship, which

manifested itself in remarkably similar values, institutions, and societies
around the

globe. We form a community of descent that antedates the glory that was
Greece, the

grandeur that was Rome, and the dynamic majesty of Christendom and the West

thousands of years. Nor has that greatness been a result of environmental
chance, as our

detractors like to claim—Western culture is the unique creation of our White
race. As my

late friend Sam Francis said: “the genetic endowments of the creating
people” were

essential to this civilization.


Despite our glorious heritage and the existential threat we face, Whites
continue to be

divided by ancient allegiances and historical rivalries, as well as an
indifference to racial

identity. How quickly we spring to the aid of nonwhites around the world;
how slow we

are to stand with our kin in Europe, Southern Africa, and elsewhere. In this
era of

globalism, it is imperative for us as White people to recall that blood is
thicker than

water. As Ben Franklin said, “We must indeed all hang together, or assuredly
we will all

hang separately.”

To prevail in our existential crisis, it is all-important to seize the moral
high ground. Our

civilization is in a mortal struggle with enemies who will stop at nothing.

Their most powerful weapon against us is the exploitation of a perverse
altruism that is

deeply rooted in our people’s moral sense. I use the word “perverse”
advisedly, because

this is an altruism that goes beyond just helping others—it actually works
against our

people’s interests.

There are few better examples of this perverse altruism than the twisted
ideals that

inspired the radical abolitionist John Brown in his murderous career. Over
the past

century, the great White moral crusades against slavery have snowballed to

ending White colonial rule, enforcing racial equality, imposing racial
integration, and

enabling massive Third World immigration to the West. However, the success
of these

crusades has failed to satisfy the moralistic yearnings of what has become a
*growing fifth*

*column in the West*. In fact, this suicidal “altruism” has metastasized to
a blanket

condemnation of our traditions, achievements, and aspirations—as “unjust”

“immoral”—the fruits of our great accomplishments are dismissed as “White

A couple of points about the White “moral” crusade against White people:

First, the blind moralism that empowers our enemies is easily exploited by

Whites. Think of the fortunes made from the War Between the States; think of
the wealth

amassed by employing cheap Third World labor.

Second, our White do-gooder “altruists,” in their anti-White fervor, seldom
consider the

possible consequences of their fanaticism. Many have died in foreign
conflicts allegedly

waged for “humanitarian” reasons. This same anti-White fervor also leads to
a disregard

for simple fairness, justice and Constitutional rights for pro-White

Let’s look at some anti-White and anti-Western causes which have depended on

distorted White morality for their success:

--There’s the so-called “civil rights” and “racial equality” movement.

journalists, clergymen, professors, businessmen, and millions of other White
people of

the right, left and center support a movement that, no matter its original
intent, has

morphed into an unceasing campaign for non-White privilege. Yet despite the

movement’s “success” most Black Americans find themselves continually
bedeviled by


crime, illegitimacy, and myriad social and economic woes. Many avowed

“conservatives,” from the late Charlton Heston to today’s Glen Beck, have

supported the bogus crusade for “civil rights” out of a misplaced altruism.

--Parallel to that was White opposition to European colonialism—it was the

cultural elite of France who lobbied for Algerian independence—throwing the

living there to the wolves.

--Later came massive White support against White rule in Rhodesia and South

Africa. A twisted so-called “morality” was motivating their efforts:
thousands of Whites

rallied to support black rule in Southern Africa.

--These anticolonial and anti-apartheid efforts were White led anti-White

altruism. Various aid programs facilitate this, from the Peace Corps to the

Monetary Fund, along with our soldiers on the front lines of the thankless
struggles to

feed, clothe, teach, and heal the unfortunate populations of hell-holes from
Haiti to


--A tsunami of Third World immigration threatens to drown the West. Here the

role of Western churches symbolizes the nexus between skewed morality and

fervor. Mainstream Christian churches, with overwhelmingly White

supported the “sanctuary” movement harboring illegal aliens and support tax

resettlement of Third World immigrants in the West.

--And, of course, there are the politically correct attacks on our race and

history. The message here is that the West has been oppressive and immoral,
and that the

only moral course for us is White guilt and selling out our own people.

All this shows that many Whites are clueless to anti-White propaganda,

about the real world, and thereby vulnerable to having their moral scruples

against their own race.

So we have a problem. It is accompanied by a paradox: not only do large
numbers of

Whites side with their race’s adversaries, for so called moral reasons, but
they fail to

notice that in doing so, Whites are behaving more morally than nonwhites.
Nonwhites do

not act against their group self-interest--they have no moral hang ups about


It is precisely our people’s finely tuned sense of morality that has enabled
our enemies to

enlist so many Whites in their campaign against the West. In no race,
culture, or

civilization have standards of decency, fair play, justice, and morality
flourished as they

have among Europeans.

I’m not talking about simple interpersonal ethics—all peoples have rules of

behavior. What I mean is a morality that strives to be universal. No other
race has been as

creative, indeed driven, in producing systems of thought that considered
ethics, or right

behavior, not from the point of personal, tribal, or national
self-advantage, but rather in

terms of a universal standard.

For better or worse, humanism—the appreciation of human beings as such—and

universalism, the quest to extend civilization in all its forms to mankind,
arose in the


philosophy and literature of ancient Greece and the legal codes of imperial

Christianity supplanted the inward-looking ethic of the Torah and the Talmud
with the

command to love one’s neighbor as oneself, rigorously defining “neighbor” in

teachings of Jesus Christ to include all humankind. Western Christianity in
all its

variants, fostered a conscience and a consciousness among its adherents
that, for agonies

of self-examination and introspection, have no rivals among other races.

Western philosophy, from Socrates to Kant and to the present day, has no

rivals in defining a universal ethic. The moral and legal standards of White

have encompassed the culturally and racially alien to an extent unrivalled
among the non-

Western cultures so esteemed by diversity fanatics. And, whatever the
ethical lapses of

our people in their darkest periods, they have ultimately yielded to the
urgings of their

priests and preceptors, and above all to their own hearts. Seen in this
light, the twisted

altruism of Whites who despise their race, what some of them sneeringly call

“Whiteness,” is a behavior that is deeply White.

A few specifics:

--In the sixteenth century the Spanish cleric Bartolomeo de Las Casas
condemned his

country’s treatment of America’s Indians. Emperor Charles V named him the

“Protector of Indian Rights”; he and his successors were able to help the
Indians, thereby

establishing the conditions for Latin America’s vast mestizo population, as
well as for the

march of “La Raza” into the White American heartland.

--Consider the late 18th century trial of Warren Hastings, the first
governor-general of

India, for mistreating Asian Indians. While Hastings was acquitted, his
ordeal fostered

high standards of conduct for the British colonial service.

--Remember it was White people who rushed to aid Haiti in the aftermath of
the 2010


How does our traditional Western morality compare with the moral standards
of other

races and cultures?

--Could one imagine, in nineteenth century black Africa, a society dedicated
to freeing

White chattels? Can one imagine it today? Historically Africans have never
shown much

interest in freeing any slaves!

--Was ever an Oriental satrap put on trial, as was Hastings, for mistreating
his White


--Which of the nonwhite countries has ever sent vast sums to aid White

--Does any of them discriminate against its own people in favor of Whites?

--Which African country has so much as spoken out against the murder of
White farmers

in Zimbabwe and South Africa?

--How many American blacks would contribute to a college scholarship fund
for needy

White students?

Those Whites who oppose our Western culture and traditions, and disavow
their own

White identity, claim to be acting in the name of morality. Others suffer
from a sickness

of the soul that forbids identifying with their own kind out of supposedly
moral or


humanitarian concerns. Only White people would think this way. However, such

repudiation of one’s own people is profoundly immoral.

If we, the men and women of the West, are to survive, we must regain the
moral high

ground from those who have falsely usurped it.

How can this be done? I am not a philosopher or ethicist. Nor do I come
before you a

prophet bearing a new moral code. Instead, I shall follow Socrates’ dictum,
that virtue

(and thus morality) is knowledge.

Many of our fellow Whites work against their own kind not just from
misplaced idealism,

but out of sheer ignorance. This ignorance stems from falsehoods spread and

suppressed by government, media and education establishments actively
hostile to the

White West.

I’ve touched on some of the untruths behind this skewed White moral
rejection of their

people and their culture, including the claims:

--that White people are uniquely bigoted;

--that Western civilization is based on oppression;

--that Western science and literature has been copied or stolen from other

--that our prosperity is not the result of Western genius and toil, but of

exploitation of nonwhite peoples and their resources;

--and perhaps the keystone to the entire mendacious arch: there are no

differences between peoples, and race doesn’t exist—but the White race is

There are so many obvious falsehoods and subsidiary lies that flow from
them. Suffice it

to say that the intellectual basis of anti-White ideology is rooted in lies.

There are a number of ways to combat this rubbish. One is to establish the
facts, to

debunk the canards against the West. One example of such garbage is the

Afrocentric notion, launched by a White professor, that the ancient Greeks

literally stole!—geometry and philosophy from Africa, leaving no copies and

memory, as a burglar smashes a car window and steals a GPS.

Another way to counter the twisted morality of those who claim the West is
immoral is to

expose the suppression of information that doesn’t support their anti-White

Consider how the government, mass media, and educational establishments:

--*distort government crime statistics*, particularly crimes by nonwhites
against Whites:

the scant publicity for white victims and non-White criminals, but ample
coverage of

“hate crimes,” when Whites are at fault;

--ignore poor academic performance by nonwhites—or blames it on “racism”;

--conceal the corresponding racial achievement gaps in science, technology,

professions, and business;

--dwell on real and imagined faults of White leaders and censor the careers
of minority

heroes, such as airbrushing the plagiarism of Martin Luther King’s doctoral


--and above all, consider the suppression of research and information on

differences between groups and individuals. Pioneers in genetics were
suppressed in

Stalin’s Soviet Union; it is telling that in the “liberal” West, our enemies
have to date

imposed a blackout on such research that has been just as effective. The
taboo on racial

differences has been pervasive: think of the white sports commentators who
have been

fired—*for merely suggesting that Blacks are better athletes than Whites!—*and

the ostracism of two Nobel laureates, William Shockley and James B. Watson,

research was central to today’s information and biotech industries, for
their heretical

views on racial differences.

What is the establishment afraid of? Certainly not those of us gathered
here. Nor do they

fear the possible conversion of their in-house antiwhite renegades—the kind
who staff

and support the SPLC, the thugs who break up our meetings, and the rest.
What the anti-

White activists—the soulless globalists, the moralizing White hairshirts,
and the minority

agitators—what they really fear is what will happen if the mass of morally

middle class Whites should wake up and discover the truth.

I’ve reminded you of the close relationship of morality and truth. When
claims of

compassion clash with those of honesty, the greatest of our minds and souls

embraced those words of the greatest moral preceptor of the West: “And ye
shall know

the truth, and the truth will make you free.” (John 8:32)

In our struggle to prevail, exposing the immorality and injustice of the

movement is of paramount importance. The opposition is anything but moral.

diversity’s mask of tolerance and openness, there is a plethora of programs,
from socalled

“affirmative action” to nonwhite preferences in college admissions, housing,

employment, and small business loans. All these programs discriminate
against White

Americans. This is institutionalized anti-White racism, which is pervasive
throughout the


Not only does anti-White racism prevail in education and business, we see it

--in politics, where Congressional districts are apportioned to facilitate
the election of

nonwhites; where Southern states are monitored to insure maximum Black voter

where the New Black Panther Party can intimidate White voters with the
sanction of the

Attorney General, who openly declared that he could not go against “his
people” to

defend civil rights for Whites;

--where “historically” Black colleges have a legal right to discriminate as
they flourish

with taxpayer support;

--in the reparations movement to punish Whites, their children and their

children for ills that ended 150 years ago, a movement already in force by
way of

discriminatory “compensation” for alleged black farmers. Already over a
billion dollars

has been paid to supposed black farmers for alleged “discrimination” in farm

programs. Anyone, yes, anyone claiming to be a Black farmer was
eligible--Whites need

not apply;


--in the immigration corporate welfare racket: globalists demand cheap
labor, which

means Third World immigration. They peddle it to the public with “diversity
is our

strength” propaganda, and if you don’t like it, you’re an evil “racist.”

So here we have it: the so-called “morality” of the anti-White movement is a
paper tiger.

But how do defenders of the West arouse our people’s moral sense in their
own defense?

We must simply seize the moral high ground.

While I applaud the courage of people who devote great effort spreading the
truth about

challenges facing the West through well-reasoned intellectual arguments,
that is not

sufficient. To fight affirmative action and other injustices, we need more
than intellectual

arguments. In fact, we shouldn't have to make intellectual arguments at all.
Our demands

should be rooted in morality—*our *morality.

Establishing the truth and justice of our cause is key to winning the moral
high ground,

which means everything in the West. The same moral compass that fosters
White guilt is

a powerful weapon when Whites realize that they have been wronged.

Historically, Western peoples have been slower than others to anger at
mistreatment, but

when at last their tolerance is exhausted, their sense of morality and
justice becomes a

powerful engine of resistance. Recall the long list of grievances that
preceded the

American revolution, and the English revolutions of the seventeenth century,
to name just

a few White uprisings that were directed at established White leadership.

movements were driven not by a simple desire for redistribution of power and

but by demands of rights often represented as natural or God-given.

Today, Whites dedicated to our racial and cultural survival find ourselves
in an enviable

moral position. Yes, we are on the defensive biologically as well as
morally, but that

arouses our instincts for self-defense.

Make no mistake about it, racially conscious Whites are now defending not
only our

homelands but our neighborhoods. No Asian or African army has landed on our

But the immigration invasion that has resulted from the success of specious

rationales has had its effect. The United States is now less than two thirds

The truth is that our culture and our countries belong to us. While those
cultures and

countries were led by great leaders, in the West more than anywhere else it
was the socalled

common people--of Greece and Rome, and then of Europe and its far- flung

dominions who defended and sustained them. They were the citizen-soldiers of

and Rome; the burghers and yeomen of Europe; and the proud, self-sufficient
men and

women of the soil that Thomas Jefferson saw as the bulwark of the American

Even unmemorialized, forgotten to our conscious, they live through

inheritance in every part of us. If Whites surrender the West, we will
abandon them and

betray our people.


Now, there’s no denying that our peoples, through the ages, have embraced

We are descended from those who blazed the trails, sailed the seas, and
conquered space.

Nonetheless, our European ancestors have had to defend their lands and their

time and time again against the teeming hordes of Asia and Africa, often
suffering defeat

and occupation before the final victory.

Before the Athenians routed the Persians at Salamis, three hundred Spartans
fought to the

death at Thermopylae; before Scipio crushed Hannibal’s Levantine
Carthaginians at

Zama, the Roman legions suffered disaster after disaster in defense of
Italy. Long before

Europe began its crusades, the Saracens swarmed from Africa into Spain and
as far as

Tours. Before them came the Huns, Mongols and Turks.

Perhaps it is no accident that in the memory of our people the greatest
epics are not those

of invasion and triumph but of defense against all odds. There is
Thermopylae, the

Alamo, Rorke’s Drift, and many others, where a comparative handful of
Western soldiers

held out against overwhelming odds, to victory or death.

It is our individual and collective moral imperative, as Whites, to be true
to our racial

identity, and to the vocation that flows from it. We must awaken to our
destiny. Let us

herald to our Western kindred that our race has been the *least selfish *of
races. The White

race is the Prometheus of history, and the Atlas of humanity. For us,
morality must be

morale, and this can be realized through a three-step process:

The first step is to Educate. I am a firm believer in the value of studying
our history,

learning what science has to say about the basis for our behavior, of
delving into our

religious and philosophical tradition, and acquiring the practical skills
essential to

communicating and organizing in the twenty-first century. But I counsel each
of you,

whether newcomers or proven veterans of our struggle: start with yourself.

Thus, each of us needs to learn, that if we are to prevail as a group—as a
race—it’s up to

each of us, individually. You can begin by reminding yourself, that *every
single one of us*

counts in our struggle. Take it from our adversaries: they know that just
one of us

standing up and speaking out for the West can be more effective than a
legion of selfhating


Yes, our race is on the defensive. So fortify yourself internally: stop
despairing over

every setback. And, as you gird yourself inwardly to guard the ramparts of
the West, no

longer attempt to conserve what is irretrievable, or defend that which is
lost. How many

of us continue to support our schools and churches long after they have

sepulchers of corruption? How many of us seek to sustain a tired political
process where

we’ve compromised on essentials to conserve irrelevancies? Jettison what’s
lost, useless,

and rotten.

Strive not only to be a partisan of your race—work to make your racial
loyalty the

capstone of a personal ethic of honor, courage, loyalty, compassion, and the
rest of our

Western moral virtues. Steep yourselves in the greatest and noblest of what
is the West:


art and philosophy and literature; the mythic and the mystical as well as
history and the

sciences. Strive as well to be balanced and self-controlled; an inner fire
that burns warm

and bright shouldn’t flare and explode, scorching ourselves as well as our

The second step is to inspire. To inspire, do not presume that our race’s

achievements will motivate a people that has been dispirited by years of
defeat. It is first

of all flesh and blood men and women who inspire, through their deportment,

character, and their noble deeds.

Comport yourselves as have the finest men and women of our race. Now, I
don’t mean

that you should aim to emulate their achievements—remember that their

accomplishments, for all their glory, are done. Now it is you and what you
can do. Think,

act, work, and live as if you are the vital link in the chain from our
race’s past to its

future, because you are.

Thus, husband your energies, emotions and words for the vital struggle, for
the long haul.

When instinct and experience tells you the time is right, then speak and act

maximum economy and to maximum effect. Spare your friends and your family
the racist

blabber and the ethnic jokes. Be to all you meet, to the best of your
ability, the

embodiment of your magnificent race. Strive not to impress, but to inspire.

And try your own hand at creativity—whether music, the arts, or writing.
Even if you

never publish or exhibit, such exercise is priceless, both as
self-discipline and selfexpression.

For those of us who act with boldness, persistence, and *utmost discretion*,

prospects for proselytizing have never been better in my lifetime.

Above all, I assure you, if you acquit yourself as a White man or a white
woman, with

resolution, courage, and self-discipline, you will inspire your fellow
Whites in a way that

slipping them a handbill or sending them an email never could. Our paramount
task *right*

*now *is not to start a new political party, or to overthrow “political
correctness,” or even to

bring third world immigration under control, but rather to *rally our fellow
Westerners to*

*discover, appreciate and embrace their White identity*. This is where we

The final step is to build. In order to prevail, we need to build, and first
of all that means

to organize. None of us can prevail single-handedly. We have unequal talents

capabilities, and our life situations often limit our ability to be

So, clearly, most of us need organization: to work with others whose

complement and, we hope, exceed our own. There are several—not many—worthy

groups out there, certainly including the Council. But a few words of
advice: be as stern

with the organizations you join and support, and with their leaders, as you
are with

yourself. Remember, you are more than a building block in the future of our
race, you’re

a vital link. *Your involvement honors any worthwhile white organization*,
and your

energies and morale in our struggle are too valuable to be wasted in
flitting from group to



Each of us who actively enlists in the mortal struggle for our race’s
destiny, whatever our

gifts or our limitations, assumes a warrior’s role—some of my fellow
speakers know this

all too well. Make no mistake: the Western countries are ruled by our
adversaries, no

matter what they think in private or tell one another on the golf course. By
their fruits ye

shall know them. The psychological burden of fighting in a cause the

condemns at every turn is daunting. But we can take heart because the very
trends that

threaten us now work in our favor. You see, more “diversity,” in the short
run, at least,

works to promote heightened White identity. So reverse discrimination
actually offers an

opportunity—*if only we will seize it*.

The old way is to bemoan the election of a radical president, and then howl
even louder

when his wife invites to the White House a rapper who celebrates
cop-killers. The new

way is to communicate--spread the word about these outrages to maximum
effect. This

way bad news can effect good news.

--Then there’s the real good news--Whites are finally beginning to wake up.
A recent

Harvard/Tufts survey ( reveals
that nearly

half of Whites interviewed feel that Whites are more discriminated against
than blacks.

And more good news: this revived racial consciousness is especially evident
in Europe,

with the continuing success of nationalist political movements.

Further, your iron-clad commitment to do whatever possible whenever possible

essential. Discover your abilities (you have more than you think), and
determine how and

where to apply them. Don’t sit out the battle because you can’t find the

application for your most outstanding talent. If nothing else, fuel the
fight with financial

support. A little goes a long way, and there are few more vital ways to
participate. But do

whatever you can—*every single one of us *is part of this struggle.

Yes, it is our great, *UN*common people as a whole, whose intelligence,

resolve, and fairness have made us truly the wonder of the world. As we
fight for justice,

let us comport ourselves with genuine self- respect, not with the narrowness
of bigotry

but with the greatness of soul of men like Thomas Jefferson. Speaking truth
to power—

civilly and persuasively—is the *first *step, and the best way, to rally our
people to victory

against those who would reduce us to a persecuted minority.

So we shall labor—with unwavering courage—for the posterity of our great

people. The sheer justice of our cause, integrity of our intentions and
spirit of

determination that animates our people will slowly, eventually, surely, meet

challenges we face. Let us *always *remember this, lest we ever be tempted
to doubt that

the struggle before us is worthy of the Herculean task.

Yes my friends, most certainly--we shall prevail.

*LOUIS T. MARCH, J.D. is a native North Carolinian. He served as an aide to
U.S. Senator Jesse Helms*

*and later worked as a Washington lobbyist and government affairs
consultant, subsequently becoming*

*active in the representation of closely held companies for merger,
acquisition and private placement of*

*capital. He has traveled extensively, is a frequent public speaker and
former radio talk show host. His*

*background in government, business and philanthropic activity has provided
an in-depth understanding of*


*public policy, the political process, and general public impact. March is
author of Immigration and the End*

*of Self-Government and Harvest of Lies: The Black Farmer Lawsuit Against
the U.S. Department of*

*Agriculture. He currently lives with his family on a farm in the Shenandoah
Valley of Virginia.*

*Mr. March can be contacted through or at [email protected]*
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
Page 16 of 95
Powered by MMS Blog