Former Canadian Diplomat Ian Macdonald Asks: "Is it immigration insanity or cunning c

Written by Paul Fromm

Wednesday, 08 June 2011 03:37

*Former Canadian Diplomat Ian Macdonald Asks: "Is it immigration insanity or cunning conspiracy?"* *Thirty years ago there was a chance that the merit system could have been reimposed but it is now much too late since the Immigration Lobby has acquired political power and in any event is a creature of the NWO elite who need to destabilize and denationalize the country to complete the takeover. Since there is no debate in the media, most people think the black influx is just happenstance. In fact, it is an integral part of the Grand Plan whereby only one "nation" (guess who) will retain its integrity and supremacy. I.V.* ** : Immigration insanity June 6, 2011 Editor *NATIONAL POST* Toronto Dear Sir, *Immigration insanity - or cunning conspiracy?* Thanks to a mole in the Immigration Department, since 1970 I have known of the surreptitious sabotage of Canadian immigration policy which originated with Pierre Trudeau's secret, vengefult machinations to impose his vision of "racial balance" on Canada. His plan was endorsed by his powerful, no less sinister "advisors", whose interests he served, wittingly or unwittingly, without the knowledge or consent of the predominantly white population of the time. Secrecy was necessary since public knowledge of the plan would have created outrage throughout the country and doomed the Liberal Party's chances of re-election. Thus, no public anouncement was made nor debate permitted in Partiament or the media, although the goal was stated in a confidential memo from Minister Marchand to senior bureaucrats at the time, quoting the Prime Minister. To increase the hitherto non-existent flow of visible minorities, formerly barred by the "ässimilability" criterion, immigration offices were opened in the West Indies, fruitlessly at first since only a handful of applicants could meet the minimum qualifications. Simultaneously, long-established offices in traditional source countries were closed and applicants appearing at Canadian Embassies were rudely rebuffed (in the mid-'seventies as I waited in the reception at the Canadian High Commission in London, a very attractive young lady, who turned out to be Assistant to the Managing Director of a London company, arrived and said she wished to emigrate to Canada. Although her skills (and genes) were much needed in Canada, the Canadian clerk on duty replied: "There is no point in my even giving you the application forms, because I know you will not be accepted"). At the same time as the comely, talented Briton was being rejected out-of-hand, literally countless thousands of unemployable, unassimilable, unscreened, aesthetically-challenged blacks from the shanty-towns of the West Indies were arriving at the Toronto Airport and whisked through the terminal directly onto the welfare system, where they and their progeny largely remain, at phenomenal, unnecessary cost to the City of Toronto and the country. The seemingly mindless opening of the flood-gates was illegal and a gross violation of Canada's traditional merit selection policy, but woe betide the conscientious Immigration Officer who raised objections or tried to stem the tide. With various refinements (refugee and family reunion, legal aid and other pretexts) the door to the Third World has remained wide open, even under the present "conservative" government now setting the stage for an unlimited seaborne invasion which could destroy Canadian society as we know it, and further impoverish native-born taxpayers. An important aspect of the open-door policy that is still well-concealed, is the cost to the source countries of Canada's profligacy. Firstly, it deprives the sending country of its more energetic and artful members. Secondly, it deprives the Third World generally of funds that could be used to support in comfort a hundred-fold the numbers in their native habitat for the cost of each one maintained in Canada on our very high welfare standards. It is well known that a good proportion of the welfare payments to migrants in Canada are remitted to their home countries (check out any Western Union office) but these funds are not spent on roads, schools and hospitals, they go for airline tickets to Canada for friends and relatives, compounding the problem. It is rumoured that money for airline tickets is also provided by European agencies to relieve their countries of the increasingly unbearable burden. Something further to ponder is the news in today's *Post* that the Government has already spent $25 million on the reception of 500 Tamils, or $50,000. per man, woman and child. For a fraction of this cost, each one of the claimants could have been persuaded to remain in Sri Lanka or Thailand, or could have been persuaded to return to India, which is their ancestral homeland. Is the entire Immigration Establishment blind to this possibility, or would they perhaps see it as a threat to their lucrative, tainted spoils from the dysfunctional status quo? And, oh, just one more thing: if the well-organized Third World invasion were not by invitation of the afflicted countries, which now include even Scandinavia, then by whose Hidden Hand was it contrived? Is there a group so influential in the Western democracies, so powerful that it can force governments to act against the most vital interests of their own countries? Is the Hidden Hand that of an international Elite destabilizing the Western Christian nations to forestall united opposition to cabalistic One World Government? Is there any other plausible explanation? As ever, Ian V. Macdonald

 

Kevin Vickers -- Poster Boy for Political Correctnesss

Written by Paul Fromm

Tuesday, 07 June 2011 06:12

Kevin Vickers -- Poster Boy for Political Correctnesss One usually expects civil servants to be reticent about their political opinions, but not Canada's Parliamentary Sergeant-at Arms,. He's a fervent proponent of multiculturalism. While bringing a pocket knife or hunting knife into the Parliament Buildings would be strictly forbidden, much less a handgun, although these are part of many traditional Canadians' culture, Vickers is positively ecstatic about welcoming Sikhs packing daggers -- ur, *kirpans*. On June 1, the former Mountie received an award from the World Sikh Organization because "last winter, while the Quebec National Assembly banned the kirpan, Mr. Vickers moved to ensure that the ceremonial dagger be allowed in the Commons despite a Bloc Québécois motion calling for it to be prohibited." (*Globe and Mail*, June 2, 2011) Well, actually the *kirpan* is not "ceremonial": it's a full-blown metal shiv and has been used, most unceremoniously, on a number of publicized occasions in recent months by angry Sikhs to hack up opponents.. Flushed with the Sikhs' honour, civil servant Vickers delivered what the * Globe* called a "moving speech [explaining] his view of the country and what led to his decision. ... Mr. Vickers said that he doesn’t like the word 'tolerance' or the phrase 'a tolerant society.' I am going to tolerate you wearing the *kirpan* within the Parliamentary Precinct. No. As head of security, I am going to accept and embrace your symbol of faith within the Parliamentary Precinct,' he said. 'As we go forward, we should ask ourselves what Canada should be when it grows up,' he said. 'We have a long way to go before reaching adulthood. The seizure of the kirpans at the Quebec legislature last winter demonstrates the challenges that lay before us as we continue on this journey of sewing together the fabric of our nation with the thread of multiculturalism. Perhaps it would be beneficial for our country, as a nation, to define its core values. What are the core values of Canada, what makes up the soul and heart of our nation?;'” "Moving?" The speech moves one to vomit. Why must we embrace other culturs and religions? Are all equally compatible with the Christian European culture that built this great land? So, while Vickers would "accept and embrace" a *kirpan* packing Sikh, he'd presumably exclude a member of one of Canada's founding/settler people with a jack knife or hunting knife. The Quebec National Assembly had this issue right earlier this year. Many of the Globe's on-line readers were also appalled at the opinioned sergeant-at-arms. Here follow a few comments: Parliament to ‘accept and embrace’ wearing of kirpan, sergeant-at-arms explains JANE TABER Globe and Mail Update Posted on Thursday, June 2, 2011 11:06PM EDT Overlooked amid all the usual promises of improved decorum and tone in the House of Commons as MPs elected a new Speaker Thursday was this story about Kevin Vickers. Mr. Vickers, 54, is the sergeant-at-arms in the Commons – perhaps familiar to some Canadians as the tall man in black carrying the mace into the House. Appointed in 2006, he oversees the security of the parliamentary precinct and sits quietly in his seat in the chamber when the Commons is in session. <http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/dieu-protge-la-reine-says-young-quebecker/article2045311/> From his vantage point, he could tell you exactly who are the worst of the heckling MPs. But he is discreet. He is not elected; he does not seek the limelight or give interviews. Wednesday night, however, just before MPs were to get back to work and he was to return to the chamber after the May 2 election, Mr. Vickers was honoured for his defence of the culture and values of the Commons. Last winter, while the Quebec National Assembly banned the kirpan, Mr. Vickers moved to ensure that the ceremonial dagger be allowed in the Commons despite a Bloc Québécois motion calling for it to be prohibited. For that, the World Sikh Organization of Canada paid tribute to him at a dinner in Ottawa. And there, Mr. Vickers, who had served for 29 years as an RCMP officer, explained in a moving speech his view of the country and what led to his decision. He noted that as a young boy growing up in Miramichi, N.B., he saw his father invite home students from developing countries, who were studying about co-operatives at the Coady Institute at St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, N.S. Sitting around the dining room table and listening to their stories, he said, he learned to respect the culture and dignity of others. “I see your wearing of the kirpan, especially in our Parliamentary buildings, as exactly that, respecting your dignity,” he told the WSO members. “But just as the kirpan issue came before us last winter, we are reminded how vigilant we must be to not only defend but promote the practices, cultures and religions of all peoples.” Mr. Vickers said that he doesn’t like the word “tolerance” or the phrase “a tolerant society.” “I am going to tolerate you wearing the kirpan within the Parliamentary Precinct. No. As head of security, I am going to accept and embrace your symbol of faith within the Parliamentary Precinct,” he said. “As we go forward, we should ask ourselves what Canada should be when it grows up,” he said. “We have a long way to go before reaching adulthood. The seizure of the kirpans at the Quebec legislature last winter demonstrates the challenges that lay before us as we continue on this journey of sewing together the fabric of our nation with the thread of multiculturalism. Perhaps it would be beneficial for our country, as a nation, to define its core values. What are the core values of Canada, what makes up the soul and heart of our nation?” Mr. Vickers recalled his interview for the post when he was asked why he wanted the job. “… I told them that if they made me their sergeant-at-arms, there would be no walls built around Canada’s Parliamentary buildings,” he said. “… and the fact that you may wear your kirpans within the House of Commons, proves there are no walls around Parliament and I have kept my promise.”

 

A PRINCIPAL'S OPENING MESSAGE TO STUDENTS

Written by Paul Fromm

Monday, 06 June 2011 01:53

*If only this were true in schools across the country! * *A PRINCIPAL'S OPENING MESSAGE TO STUDENTS* "To the students and faculty of our high school: I am your new principal, and honored to be so. There is no greater calling than to teach young people. I would like to apprise you of some important changes coming to our school. I am making these changes because I am convinced that most of the ideas that have dominated public education in Canada have worked against you, against your teachers, against your parents, and against our country. Therefore: First, this school will no longer honor race or ethnicity. I could not care less if your racial makeup is black, brown, red, yellow, or white. I could not care less if your origins are African, Latin American, Asian, or European, or if your ancestors arrived here on the Mayflower or on slave ships. The only identity I care about, the only one this school will recognize, is your individual identity -- your character, your scholarship, your humanity. And the only national identity this school will care about is Canadian. This is a Canadian public school, and Canadian public schools were created to make better Canadians. If you wish to affirm an ethnic, racial, or religious identity through your school, you will have to go elsewhere. We will end all ethnicity-,race- and non-Canadian-nationality-based celebrations. They undermine the motto of Canada.. And this school will be guided by Canada 's values. That includes all after-school clubs. I will not authorize clubs that divide students based on any identities. This includes race, language, religion, sexual orientation, or whatever else may become in vogue in a society divided by political correctness. Your clubs will be based on interests and passions -- not blood, ethnic, racial or other physically defined ties. Those clubs just cultivate narcissism -- an unhealthy preoccupation with the self -- while the purpose of education is to get you to think beyond yourself. So, we will have clubs that transport you to the wonders and glories of art, music, astronomy, languages you do not already speak, math, carpentry, and more. If the only extracurricular activities you can imagine being interested in are those based on ethnic or racial or sexual identity, that means that little outside of yourself really interests you. Second, I am not interested in whether or not English is your native language. My only interest in terms of language is that you leave this school speaking and writing English as fluently as possible. The English language has united Canada's citizens for more than 140 years, and it will unite us at this school. It is one of the indispensable reasons this country of immigrants has always come to be one country. And if you leave this school without excellent English-language skills, I will have been remiss in my duty to ensure that you are prepared to compete successfully in the Canadian job market. We will learn other languages here -- it is deplorable that most Canadians only speak English . But if you want classes taught in your native language rather than in English, this is not your school. \ Third, because I regard learning as a sacred endeavor, everything in this school will reflect learning's elevated status. This means, among other things, that you and your teachers will dress accordingly. Many people in our society dress more formally for a meal at a nice restaurant than they do for church or school. Those people have their priorities backwards. Therefore, there will be a formal dress code at this school. Fourth, no obscene language will be tolerated anywhere on this school's property -- whether in class, in the hallways or at athletic events. If you can't speak without using the "F-word," you can't speak.. By obscene language I mean the words banned by the Federal Communications Commission plus epithets such as the "N-word," even when used by one black student to address another, or "bitch," even when addressed by a girl to a girlfriend. It is my intent that by the time you leave this school, you will be among the few of your age to distinguish instinctively between the elevated and the degraded, the holy and the obscene. Fifth, we will end all self-esteem programs. In this school, self-esteem will be attained in only one way -- the way people attained it by earning it. One immediate consequence of this is that there will be only one class valedictorian, not eight. Sixth, and last, I am reorienting the school toward academics and away from politics and propaganda. No more time will be devoted to scaring you about smoking and caffeine, or terrifying you about sexual harassment or global warming. No more semesters will be devoted to condom-wearing and teaching you to regard sexual relations as only or primarily a health issue. There will be no more attempts to convince you that you are a victim because you are not white, or not male, or not heterosexual, or not Christian. We will have failed, if any one of you graduates from this school and does not consider himself or herself inordinately lucky -- to be alive and to be an Canadian. Now, please stand and join me in singing, OH CANADA to the only flag in Canada. As many of you do not know the words, your teachers will hand them out to you."